17.6 sec in total
6.3 sec
11 sec
357 ms
Click here to check amazing PROGILENCE content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about progilence.com
Talking Change, Changing Talk
Visit progilence.comWe analyzed Progilence.com page load time and found that the first response time was 6.3 sec and then it took 11.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
progilence.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value6.4 s
10/100
25%
Value17.7 s
0/100
10%
Value6,710 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.192
64/100
15%
Value22.8 s
1/100
10%
6281 ms
273 ms
506 ms
515 ms
522 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Progilence.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Progilence.com.
Page size can be reduced by 850.2 kB (52%)
1.6 MB
778.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Progilence.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 828.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PROGILENCE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 596.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 596.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 158.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Progilence.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 158.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (61%)
82
32
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PROGILENCE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
progilence.com
6281 ms
style.css
273 ms
green.css
506 ms
bg.css
515 ms
pretty-photo.css
522 ms
styles.css
519 ms
jquery-ui.css
57 ms
jquery-ui.css
542 ms
custom-contact-forms-standards.css
547 ms
custom-contact-forms.css
754 ms
jquery.js
1061 ms
custom-contact-forms-datepicker.js
779 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
1030 ms
custom-contact-forms.js
812 ms
widgetkit-e3ce86c6.css
815 ms
widgetkit-77ce5b07.js
1006 ms
swfobject.js
1058 ms
jquery-1.7.js
11 ms
jquery.cycle.all.latest.js
1114 ms
chopslider-3.css
1114 ms
chopslider-3.js
1259 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
1800 ms
jquery.pretty_photo.js
1314 ms
script.js
1313 ms
cufon-yui.js
1347 ms
Default.font.js
1620 ms
jquery.id.chopslider-2.2.0.pro.min.js
1515 ms
jquery.id.cstransitions-1.2.min.js
1581 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
1579 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.min.js
1621 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1768 ms
scripts.js
1843 ms
lightbox.js
753 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
818 ms
spotlight.js
815 ms
bg_home.jpg
1438 ms
Progilence-capability-development.png
969 ms
whowearehome.png
1784 ms
CDLMGB-LOGO-B-W-3-FINAL.jpg
1015 ms
NESTED-Badge.jpg
1337 ms
IMG_0323-2503-227x300.jpg
1080 ms
IMG_0325-250c-225x300.jpg
1230 ms
IMG_0326-250b-225x300.jpg
1532 ms
IMG_0329-250-229x300.jpg
1349 ms
IMG_0331-250-225x300.jpg
1493 ms
IMG_0332-250-227x300.jpg
1609 ms
IMG_0333-250-226x300.jpg
1622 ms
IMG_0334-250-223x300.jpg
1688 ms
IMG_0335-250-223x300.jpg
1753 ms
IMG_0337-250-225x300.jpg
1795 ms
IMG_0339-250-223x300.jpg
1879 ms
IMG_0340-250-225x300.jpg
1892 ms
brochure_2.png
2184 ms
user_line_bg.png
2005 ms
nav_bg.png
2024 ms
nav_sep.jpg
2024 ms
ga.js
10 ms
nav_item.jpg
1987 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
search_bg.png
1948 ms
search_but.png
2062 ms
middle_top_line.png
2046 ms
middle_bg.jpg
1904 ms
middle_top_bg.png
1935 ms
sep.png
1965 ms
headline_sep.png
1927 ms
new_prev.png
2014 ms
new_next.png
1881 ms
more.png
1869 ms
middle_bot.jpg
1941 ms
bottom_block.jpg
1916 ms
test_block.png
1889 ms
test_prev.png
1985 ms
test_next.png
1848 ms
list_item_green.png
1864 ms
bottom_line_bg.jpg
1883 ms
show.png
1732 ms
hide.png
1664 ms
bottom_sep.png
1716 ms
sl-control.png
1635 ms
caption-bg.png
1648 ms
pagination.png
1684 ms
footer_bg.jpg
1622 ms
sub_nav_item.jpg
275 ms
progilence.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
progilence.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
progilence.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Progilence.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Progilence.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
progilence.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PROGILENCE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: