3.3 sec in total
428 ms
2.6 sec
273 ms
Click here to check amazing Programmer Interview content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about programmerinterview.com
Programmer and Software Interview Questions and Answers
Visit programmerinterview.comWe analyzed Programmerinterview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 428 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
programmerinterview.com performance score
428 ms
36 ms
58 ms
76 ms
71 ms
Our browser made a total of 132 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Programmerinterview.com, 8% (11 requests) were made to A.disquscdn.com and 6% (8 requests) were made to Contextual.media.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (620 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (60%)
1.8 MB
706.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Programmerinterview.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Programmer Interview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Programmerinterview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (70%)
122
36
The browser has sent 122 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Programmer Interview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
programmerinterview.com
428 ms
LctLDoAwCADRC1nRleepLSoJLQbwd3ub6HreDLCrrBpLQaXqqCfhBeYPYzdCkuoxeVhES5iAauIjo0Ey-4w1xLRuPssddj7-tMUsF-b2s2hLfaH6Ag.css
36 ms
M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzAA.js
58 ms
api.js
76 ms
jquery.min.js
71 ms
ezjquery-noconflict.js
30 ms
element.js
73 ms
brand
70 ms
nmedianet.js
163 ms
adsbygoogle.js
27 ms
M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPAqLC0tSiSj2QjF5uZh4A.js
25 ms
HcnBDYAgDADAhSwND2McRytqSaFYINHtNX7vPJLmtlCDXS3BhJxJ-hYqxoqVjEurg0fh42yr3lCk_xWvHuxxpKL2ufNudDMkzi8.js
51 ms
api.js
86 ms
M9RPySwuLC3WTc7PzU3NK9EtriwuSc3Vz01NyUzUzyqGSgMA.js
51 ms
M9RPySwuLC3WTc7PzU3NK9EtriwuSc3Vz01NyUzUzyrWT84vzSsBAA.js
65 ms
tb.php
84 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
29 ms
brand
55 ms
recaptcha__en.js
118 ms
ga.js
35 ms
translateelement.css
73 ms
main.js
101 ms
gplus-32.png
121 ms
top-bg.gif
9 ms
header.jpg
9 ms
logo.gif
9 ms
jb-logo.gif
5 ms
__utm.gif
46 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
bullet1.gif
19 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
25 ms
px.gif
93 ms
bping.php
16 ms
fcmdynet.js
177 ms
px.gif
34 ms
checksync.php
92 ms
element_main.js
38 ms
usermatch
10 ms
usermatch
12 ms
VtTLAsAoJEIAAGQ6AhUAAAFV%26117
43 ms
gr
9 ms
ca
112 ms
casale
34 ms
ecsync.php
41 ms
csync.php
124 ms
pixel
36 ms
crum
16 ms
rum
93 ms
log.php
4 ms
crum
39 ms
pixel
16 ms
crum
32 ms
mediamain.html
578 ms
spriteme.png
11 ms
subscribe-bt.png
38 ms
ca-pub-4184197171686251.js
45 ms
zrt_lookup.html
46 ms
show_ads_impl.js
48 ms
crum
13 ms
fcmdynet.js
216 ms
bping.php
7 ms
ads
267 ms
osd.js
16 ms
ads
317 ms
mediamain.html
526 ms
widgets.js
9 ms
plusone.js
79 ms
bping.php
6 ms
fcmdynet.js
504 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
10 ms
m_js_controller.js
25 ms
abg.js
38 ms
favicon
57 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
34 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
32 ms
s
26 ms
x_button_blue2.png
16 ms
Big_Data_-_Make_Sense_300x250.gif
32 ms
sbhK2lTE.js
21 ms
cTrvNaRi.html
6 ms
E4WYPs_lNJIuXrWpTsOcc3FIG36RfI0ERc0srw5QW9Y.js
10 ms
getlc.js
97 ms
nrr.js
38 ms
AdChoices.png
75 ms
Lusitana_Bold.woff
47 ms
bql.php
4 ms
px.gif
200 ms
mediamain.html
325 ms
ads
244 ms
bql.php
10 ms
footer-bg.gif
6 ms
embed.js
180 ms
count.js
48 ms
ajax-loader.gif
11 ms
fallback
100 ms
translate_24dp.png
17 ms
l
40 ms
cleardot.gif
15 ms
like.php
195 ms
fallback__ltr.css
9 ms
payload
32 ms
css
64 ms
134 ms
2530
45 ms
logo_48.png
26 ms
refresh.png
29 ms
audio.png
35 ms
32d0a62d85251d2362523fef8331cb90_1.html
111 ms
bql.php
6 ms
px.gif
140 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
595 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
620 ms
lounge.load.7ff52449a33b7f7845efccc7ceb593f0.js
25 ms
st.v2.js
62 ms
lounge.f668c82e65f78693a6a62a5c7d3e54b8.css
26 ms
config.js
14 ms
common.bundle.9ae7822392ee2a14113a2ad6a3b21094.js
70 ms
lounge.bundle.3c837e68b4ad2bac281cb14bf37d9fb5.js
50 ms
1648b15bfd5d4715ce764947a1ae19b3.jpg
62 ms
cvo.gif
60 ms
gr
80 ms
ga.js
158 ms
pixel_details.html
70 ms
loader.5cc23909da9c4a9874500d7a85c4125f.gif
117 ms
discovery.4d8b8fc1ac260183bf86f0fd8a6774c6.css
92 ms
sprite.06bad3144429d24544aa8b00ffd77160.png
75 ms
icons.dcb5405f8abc9a80e5628869f735eaf0.woff
58 ms
noavatar92.4549c5353ccf103d32a8b81a856576ed.png
105 ms
discovery.bundle.bb4e527a9df4b78c58cbbb7890c3383d.js
95 ms
__utm.gif
73 ms
noavatar92.png
62 ms
programmerinterview.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Programmerinterview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Programmerinterview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
programmerinterview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Programmer Interview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: