2.4 sec in total
339 ms
1.9 sec
121 ms
Visit projectmapping.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Project Mapping content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about projectmapping.co.uk
Visit projectmapping.co.ukWe analyzed Projectmapping.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 339 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
projectmapping.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.2 s
99/100
10%
Value2.3 s
93/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
339 ms
176 ms
67 ms
92 ms
96 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original Projectmapping.co.uk, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (614 ms) belongs to the original domain Projectmapping.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 69.1 kB (38%)
179.7 kB
110.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Projectmapping.co.uk main page is 179.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 113.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Project Mapping needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 45% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (43%)
100
57
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Project Mapping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
projectmapping.co.uk
339 ms
FW_Object.js
176 ms
urchin.js
67 ms
pmlogoh.gif
92 ms
item3b1d.gif
96 ms
item1a4a1a2p.gif
174 ms
item1a4a1a2ac.gif
174 ms
item4a3-1.gif
176 ms
item4a1-3.gif
177 ms
item4a3-2.gif
180 ms
item1a4an.gif
190 ms
item4a2b-13.gif
256 ms
item4a1a2-32.gif
257 ms
item4a1a2-33.gif
263 ms
item4a2b-14.gif
258 ms
item1a4a2bn.gif
265 ms
item4a2b-15.gif
282 ms
item4a1-4.gif
340 ms
item1a4a1f.gif
342 ms
item4a1-5.gif
343 ms
item4a1a2-34.gif
345 ms
item4a1a2ac.gif
346 ms
item1a4ar.gif
371 ms
item4a3-3.gif
424 ms
item1a4a2a1d.gif
432 ms
item4a1a1x.gif
426 ms
item1a4a1b.gif
435 ms
item4a1a2-36.gif
433 ms
item4a2a1f.gif
460 ms
item4a1b.gif
512 ms
item4a1ba.gif
517 ms
item4a1-6.gif
515 ms
item4a3-4.gif
533 ms
item4a2a1g.gif
533 ms
_clear.gif
560 ms
iphoneimage.jpeg
600 ms
item1a4a1b1u.gif
603 ms
item4a3aa.gif
603 ms
item1a.gif
614 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
item4a3ab.gif
531 ms
item1a4a2.gif
569 ms
londonrailandtub.jpeg
519 ms
largeprinttubema.jpeg
519 ms
londonrailandtuba.jpeg
516 ms
item1a3b1a1a1.gif
529 ms
londonrailandtubb.jpeg
527 ms
item1a3b1a1a1a.gif
566 ms
largeprinttubemaa.jpeg
522 ms
item1b1a1a.gif
525 ms
item4a3ac.gif
521 ms
item1a2ba.gif
531 ms
item1a2b1.gif
535 ms
item1ab.gif
563 ms
item1a2a.gif
525 ms
londonrailandtubc.jpeg
525 ms
largeprinttubemab.jpeg
522 ms
item1a3b1a1.gif
539 ms
item1a3b1a1a.gif
539 ms
railmapv214dec20.jpeg
559 ms
railnetoutline88p.jpeg
601 ms
tocs234dec2010.jpeg
523 ms
tocsasv78dec2014.jpeg
521 ms
londonrailv29.jpeg
532 ms
londonoverunderg.jpeg
534 ms
item3a2a1b.gif
555 ms
londonrailv29a.jpeg
520 ms
londonrailv29b.jpeg
526 ms
item1a3b.gif
548 ms
item1a3a1a1aa.gif
533 ms
item1a1b.gif
570 ms
hs2y.jpeg
557 ms
ireland9asinseta.jpeg
522 ms
item1a1a1a2.gif
521 ms
tocs234dec2010a.jpeg
542 ms
item1a1a1a2a1.gif
534 ms
item1a1a1a2bs.gif
573 ms
index2.gif
544 ms
item1a1a1a2bu.gif
520 ms
item1b2.gif
521 ms
item1a3a1.gif
542 ms
item1a3a2aa.gif
534 ms
item1a3a1aa.gif
574 ms
item1a3a.gif
536 ms
item1a3aa.gif
517 ms
item1a3c.gif
519 ms
ireland9asinsetaa.jpeg
538 ms
eurostarconnecti.jpeg
529 ms
lostructure24.jpeg
575 ms
manchester3.jpeg
529 ms
merseyrail22b.jpeg
511 ms
merseyrail22ba.jpeg
520 ms
singaporemrtlrt1.jpeg
539 ms
valleylines16aa.jpeg
525 ms
merseyrail22bc.jpeg
570 ms
item3a2a1f.gif
528 ms
manchester3a.jpeg
506 ms
singaporemrtlrt1b.jpeg
516 ms
manchester3b.jpeg
522 ms
singaporemrtlrt1c.jpeg
522 ms
item1a1b1a3bn.gif
520 ms
projectmapping.co.uk accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
projectmapping.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
projectmapping.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectmapping.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Projectmapping.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
projectmapping.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Project Mapping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: