6.1 sec in total
1.5 sec
2.5 sec
2.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Proposal In Paris content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about proposal-in-paris.com
Are you planning to propose soon in Paris? We are the #1 French professional photographers who aim to make your proposal in Paris unforgettable.
Visit proposal-in-paris.comWe analyzed Proposal-in-paris.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
proposal-in-paris.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value4.8 s
31/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value580 ms
51/100
30%
Value0.106
88/100
15%
Value9.4 s
30/100
10%
1518 ms
192 ms
474 ms
196 ms
222 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Proposal-in-paris.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Proposal-in-paris.com.
Page size can be reduced by 312.8 kB (40%)
786.2 kB
473.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Proposal-in-paris.com main page is 786.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 400.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Proposal In Paris images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 131.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 131.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Proposal-in-paris.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 73.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (17%)
71
59
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Proposal In Paris. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
proposal-in-paris.com
1518 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
192 ms
jquery.js
474 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
196 ms
underscore.min.js
222 ms
1458251516_script.js
332 ms
1458251516_style.css
562 ms
css
31 ms
analytics.js
149 ms
masthead_image3_1398288764.jpg
361 ms
logo_1398288134.jpg
266 ms
GF_4070-1000px(pp_w489_h303).jpg
293 ms
GF_4059-1000px-77x77.jpg
264 ms
GF_4056-1000px-77x77.jpg
263 ms
GF_4049-1000px-77x77.jpg
285 ms
GF_4047-1000px-77x77.jpg
289 ms
GF_4021-1000px-77x77.jpg
290 ms
GF_4016-1000px-77x77.jpg
293 ms
crafted_btn2_l1_img.png
302 ms
crafted_btn4_l1_img.png
293 ms
crafted_btn6_l1_img.png
295 ms
simple-smile.png
296 ms
pinit-button2.png
352 ms
SC_3009(pp_w489_h325).jpg
451 ms
SC_3005-77x77.jpg
366 ms
SC_3023-77x77.jpg
365 ms
SC_3027-77x77.jpg
391 ms
SC_3033-77x77.jpg
424 ms
SC_3037-77x77.jpg
428 ms
SC_3043-77x77.jpg
457 ms
SC_3047-77x77.jpg
460 ms
SC_3051-77x77.jpg
500 ms
SC_3052-77x77.jpg
560 ms
SC_3054-77x77.jpg
560 ms
SC_3059-77x77.jpg
573 ms
SC_3065-77x77.jpg
574 ms
SC_3070-77x77.jpg
574 ms
SC_3073-77x77.jpg
623 ms
SC_3081-77x77.jpg
642 ms
SC_3086-77x77.jpg
644 ms
SC_3093-77x77.jpg
633 ms
SC_3097-77x77.jpg
642 ms
SC_3100-77x77.jpg
630 ms
crafted_blog_bg.jpg
634 ms
1f609.png
132 ms
all.js
269 ms
lightbox.js
484 ms
ajax-comments.js
505 ms
threaded-comments.js
489 ms
collect
24 ms
pR0sBQVcY0JZc_ciXjFsK5Rby8KfwQsaipLBqMCVNtM.woff
19 ms
kH7K4InNTm7mmOXXjrA5vz8SLKRGgamuUl1hIefMyNI.woff
21 ms
QHIOz1iKF3bIEzRdDFaf5dgliI79_bmRXH6crmREtCo.woff
19 ms
Yir4ZDsCn4g1kWopdg-ehHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
20 ms
V86VyqXbc09Sss3BPsMj1z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
19 ms
pinterest.js
485 ms
crafted_primary_nav_menu_item_divider.png
476 ms
20151222_2016_1000px(pp_w489_h363).jpg
640 ms
20151222_2020_1000px-77x77.jpg
568 ms
20151222_2023_1000px-77x77.jpg
561 ms
20151222_2028_1000px-77x77.jpg
564 ms
20151222_2030_1000px-77x77.jpg
582 ms
20151222_2036_1000px-77x77.jpg
581 ms
20151222_2042_1000px-77x77.jpg
641 ms
20151222_2046_1000px-77x77.jpg
667 ms
20151222_2049_1000px-77x77.jpg
603 ms
20151222_2051_1000px-77x77.jpg
633 ms
20151222_2055_1000px-77x77.jpg
611 ms
20151222_2063_1000px-77x77.jpg
646 ms
20151222_2073_1000px-77x77.jpg
631 ms
20151222_2075_1000px-77x77.jpg
617 ms
20151222_2078_1000px-77x77.jpg
640 ms
blank.gif
634 ms
ajaxLoadingSpinner.gif
629 ms
128 ms
xd_arbiter.php
238 ms
xd_arbiter.php
446 ms
proposal-in-paris.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
proposal-in-paris.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
proposal-in-paris.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Proposal-in-paris.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Proposal-in-paris.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
proposal-in-paris.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Proposal In Paris. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: