5.4 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.5 sec
437 ms
Click here to check amazing Proud content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about proud.reviews
Visit proud.reviewsWe analyzed Proud.reviews page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
proud.reviews performance score
1392 ms
207 ms
208 ms
432 ms
451 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Proud.reviews, 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Proud.reviews.
Page size can be reduced by 786.2 kB (65%)
1.2 MB
416.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Proud.reviews main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 478.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 221.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Proud needs image optimization as it can save up to 221.1 kB or 50% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 330.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 330.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 201.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Proud.reviews needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 201.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (63%)
51
19
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Proud. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
proud.reviews
1392 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
207 ms
theme-my-login.css
208 ms
foobox.free.min.css
432 ms
bootstrap.min.css
451 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
440 ms
cyberchimps-responsive.min.css
441 ms
core.css
442 ms
style.css
708 ms
elements.css
706 ms
rich-reviews.css
706 ms
api.js
97 ms
jquery.js
741 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
697 ms
themed-profiles.js
776 ms
foobox.free.min.js
825 ms
gallery-lightbox.min.js
779 ms
jquery.slimbox.min.js
778 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
778 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
937 ms
swipe-call.min.js
867 ms
core.min.js
938 ms
elements.min.js
1664 ms
rich-reviews.js
1710 ms
ag_script.js
1703 ms
css
60 ms
frontpage.css
1308 ms
lightbox.css
1374 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1310 ms
retina-1.1.0.min.js
1374 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1480 ms
pie-chart.js
1498 ms
main.js
1498 ms
lightbox.min.js
1699 ms
recaptcha__en.js
100 ms
proudreviewlogo2.png
657 ms
title-ribbon-left.png
658 ms
title-ribbon-right.png
657 ms
slide1.jpg
662 ms
slide2.jpg
660 ms
slide3.jpg
660 ms
left-arrow.png
658 ms
right-arrow.png
658 ms
slidericon.png
753 ms
blueprint.png
753 ms
docs.png
773 ms
ribbon-sidebar-right.png
611 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
718 ms
TSDaXhyJuDJ-NBU0popSWA.ttf
23 ms
close.png
637 ms
loading.gif
640 ms
prev.png
678 ms
next.png
679 ms
foobox.svg
148 ms
foobox.woff
155 ms
proud.reviews SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Proud.reviews can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Proud.reviews main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
proud.reviews
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Proud. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: