6 sec in total
546 ms
4.6 sec
903 ms
Click here to check amazing Reviews Photographyreview content for Pakistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reviews.photographyreview.com
Visit reviews.photographyreview.comWe analyzed Reviews.photographyreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 546 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
reviews.photographyreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.1 s
20/100
10%
Value710 ms
41/100
30%
Value0.144
77/100
15%
Value14.0 s
10/100
10%
546 ms
1524 ms
113 ms
23 ms
15 ms
Our browser made a total of 235 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Reviews.photographyreview.com, 23% (54 requests) were made to Rcdn.photographyreview.com and 7% (17 requests) were made to Ap.lijit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Photographyreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 934.2 kB (53%)
1.8 MB
832.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviews.photographyreview.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 859.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 341.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 167.9 kB, which is 44% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 341.0 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reviews Photographyreview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 509.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 509.0 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviews.photographyreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 131 (61%)
214
83
The browser has sent 214 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviews Photographyreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 57 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviews.photographyreview.com
546 ms
1524 ms
style.css
113 ms
nav.css
23 ms
ga_social_tracking.js
15 ms
styles.css
91 ms
advanced-slider-base.css
197 ms
light-round.css
82 ms
slider-pro-1-custom-css.css
197 ms
postratings-css.css
96 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
439 ms
swfobject.js
91 ms
image-resize-script.js
471 ms
widgets.js
79 ms
AdvNav.css
4 ms
ga.js
45 ms
gpt.js
5 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
7 ms
container.html
15 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
bkgd_shadow_mtbr.png
687 ms
nikon-V3_front-up-150x150.jpg
303 ms
nikon-D4s_right-150x150.jpg
9 ms
ILCE-6000_wSELP1650_right_silver-1200-150x150.jpg
277 ms
nikon-P340_feat-150x150.jpg
43 ms
nikon-AW120_feat-150x150.jpg
8 ms
ricohwg20_holder_mount-150x150.jpg
381 ms
oly_EM10-sil_angle-150x150.jpg
382 ms
oly_TG-850_grn_lcd-elf-150x150.jpg
57 ms
fujifilm-XT1_front-150x150.jpg
418 ms
panasonic-zs40_angle_bl-150x150.jpg
650 ms
nikon-D3300_left-frnt-150x150.jpg
334 ms
sony-a5000_front-sil-150x150.jpg
650 ms
PowerShot_N100_wht_up-150x150.jpg
417 ms
fujifilm_56mm_Black_Front-150x150.jpg
418 ms
fujifilm-S1_Black_Front_Left-150x150.jpg
760 ms
fujifilm-instax-printer-150x150.jpg
708 ms
Galaxy-Camera-2-B-2-150x150.jpg
422 ms
samsung-NX30_frint-angle_16-50mm-150x150.jpg
703 ms
top10-interesting-cameras_2013_feat-150x150.jpg
681 ms
custom-SLR_tripod-tree-150x150.jpg
648 ms
IMG_4298_1200-150x150.jpg
702 ms
ads
326 ms
hol-guide_mirrorless_th.jpg
17 ms
quant.js
35 ms
wptouch-responsive.js
650 ms
postratings-js.js
648 ms
hol-guide_dslr_th.jpg
17 ms
hol-guide_PandS_th.jpg
25 ms
hol-guide_affordable_th.jpg
16 ms
handevision_ibelux-40mm-150x150.jpg
1045 ms
hol-guide_affordable_feat-150x150.jpg
1043 ms
10-24mm_annc-150x150.jpg
917 ms
zion-bighorn_ksbryan0_big-150x150.jpg
1188 ms
photographyreview_logo_2012.gif
39 ms
sprite_mtbr_bkgd_btn.png
342 ms
16358388978283389869
25 ms
fpi.js
9 ms
osd.js
71 ms
sync
57 ms
cse.js
56 ms
adcfg
45 ms
cse.js
142 ms
fpi.js
55 ms
addelivery
119 ms
adcfg
29 ms
latestcamerareviews.js
113 ms
addelivery
211 ms
jsapi
43 ms
default+en.css
8 ms
default.css
24 ms
default+en.I.js
45 ms
gpt.js
25 ms
default.css
28 ms
ads
318 ms
container.html
59 ms
IMG_4298_1200-150x150.jpg
31 ms
PC080032_1200-150x150.jpg
58 ms
canon-ELPH-330HS_hand-150x150.jpg
70 ms
MG_6577_1200-150x150.jpg
60 ms
IMG_2015_1200-150x150.jpg
72 ms
IMG_2023_1200-150x150.jpg
73 ms
A140500_610-150x150.jpg
105 ms
fujifilm-F900EXR_hand-150x150.jpg
74 ms
IMG_0297_1200-150x150.jpg
91 ms
IMG_1976-150x150.jpg
114 ms
fpi.js
7 ms
adcfg
9 ms
latestall.js
79 ms
addelivery
198 ms
ads
319 ms
nikon-V3_front-up-150x150.jpg
9 ms
nikon-D4s_right-150x150.jpg
27 ms
ILCE-6000_wSELP1650_right_silver-1200-150x150.jpg
10 ms
nikon-P340_feat-150x150.jpg
11 ms
nikon-AW120_feat-150x150.jpg
55 ms
ricohwg20_holder_mount-150x150.jpg
56 ms
oly_EM10-sil_angle-150x150.jpg
71 ms
oly_TG-850_grn_lcd-elf-150x150.jpg
56 ms
fujifilm-XT1_front-150x150.jpg
71 ms
panasonic-zs40_angle_bl-150x150.jpg
56 ms
fpi.js
6 ms
adcfg
11 ms
addelivery
131 ms
pixel;r=652496224;a=p-e6GjeAaqb5NP-;fpan=1;fpa=P0-890107606-1458139125734;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458139125734;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.photographyreview.com%2Freviews%2F;ogl=url.http%3A%2F%2Fwww%252Ephotographyreview%252Ecom%2Freviews%2Fnikon-1-v3-flagship-mirrorless-camera%2Csite_name.Camera%20News%20and%20Reviews%2Cdescription.%2Ctype.website%2Cimage.http%3A%2F%2Fcrev%252Evo%252Ellnwd%252Enet%2Fo42%2Fphotographyreview%2Fimages%2Fphotographyreview_logo_201%2Clocale.en_US%2Ctype.website%2Ctitle.Camera%20News%20and%20Reviews%20-%2Curl.http%3A%2F%2Fwww%252Ephotographyreview%252Ecom%2Freviews%2F%2Csite_name.Camera%20News%20and%20Reviews%2Cimage.http%3A%2F%2Fcrev%252Evo%252Ellnwd%252Enet%2Fo42%2Fphotographyreview%2Fimages%2Fphotographyreview_logo_201%2Ctype.blog%2Ctitle.Camera%20News%20and%20Reviews
72 ms
all.js
334 ms
rating_over.gif
120 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
243 ms
async-ads.js
97 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
37 ms
vglnk.js
52 ms
small-logo.png
46 ms
search_box_icon.png
49 ms
clear.png
48 ms
ads
250 ms
expansion_embed.js
42 ms
impressions
54 ms
beacon
189 ms
containertag
36 ms
27722-220991-36959-373
124 ms
abg.js
86 ms
ads
345 ms
1540_03681
94 ms
sync
156 ms
cc.js
152 ms
pixel.gif
65 ms
pixel.gif
65 ms
impressions
40 ms
containertag
41 ms
js
267 ms
merge
108 ms
728x90_AQ-3_PAYMNTS.gif
170 ms
pixel;r=2016619355;a=p-56WJ0KtIxWJ_2;labels=Publishers.Invenda.326567%2CSites.www%2Bphotographyreview%2Bcom.Invenda.US.Online;fpan=0;fpa=P0-890107606-1458139125734;ns=1;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458139125936;tzo=-180;ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.photographyreview.com%2Freviews%2F;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.photographyreview.com%2Freviews%2F;ogl=
142 ms
usermatch
159 ms
usermatch
138 ms
generic
133 ms
lj
136 ms
sync
126 ms
merge
185 ms
pixel
196 ms
merge
277 ms
pixel;r=1848432875;a=p-56WJ0KtIxWJ_2;labels=Publishers.Invenda.326568%2CSites.www%2Bphotographyreview%2Bcom.Invenda.US.Online;fpan=0;fpa=P0-890107606-1458139125734;ns=1;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458139126007;tzo=-180;ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.photographyreview.com%2Freviews%2F;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.photographyreview.com%2Freviews%2F;ogl=
240 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
145 ms
impressions
151 ms
containertag
143 ms
js
322 ms
generic
150 ms
merge
158 ms
usermatch
142 ms
302 ms
usermatch
141 ms
merge
166 ms
js
137 ms
cm
136 ms
containertag
103 ms
impressions
108 ms
img
275 ms
pixel
146 ms
ck-confirm
231 ms
xd_arbiter.php
511 ms
xd_arbiter.php
730 ms
js
326 ms
ca
215 ms
pixel.htm
217 ms
merge
171 ms
pixel
110 ms
merge
166 ms
casaleopenrtb
77 ms
Vulv9sAoJSsAAXhmExEAAABa%26584
196 ms
cs
189 ms
merge
151 ms
casale
90 ms
pixel
145 ms
pixel;r=932720719;a=p-56WJ0KtIxWJ_2;labels=Publishers.Invenda.326894%2CSites.www%2Bphotographyreview%2Bcom.Invenda.US.Online;fpan=0;fpa=P0-890107606-1458139125734;ns=1;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1458139126249;tzo=-180;ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.photographyreview.com%2Freviews%2F;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.photographyreview.com%2Freviews%2F;ogl=
864 ms
sync
202 ms
img
112 ms
crum
173 ms
rum
155 ms
pixel
127 ms
pixel
173 ms
merge
143 ms
crum
156 ms
jot
472 ms
crum
148 ms
merge
171 ms
sc.bci
170 ms
merge
169 ms
merge
168 ms
ping
202 ms
img
155 ms
pixel
152 ms
ck-confirm
161 ms
iframe
119 ms
crum
94 ms
rum
94 ms
merge
417 ms
merge
211 ms
2981
190 ms
15-Q115_WU__1_Fee_V1_D_Update_Mobile_300x250_EN_US.png
362 ms
lidar.js
334 ms
sbhK2lTE.js
256 ms
crum
450 ms
merge
253 ms
rum
266 ms
crum
245 ms
ddc.htm
324 ms
rum
283 ms
xrefid.xgi
227 ms
gpush.cogocast.net
281 ms
2981
217 ms
2-Q115_Wu_Com__1_Safeway_Fee_Agent_V2_D_300x250_EN_US.png
404 ms
img
215 ms
img
229 ms
img
217 ms
spotlight.js
149 ms
merge
129 ms
cse
433 ms
merge
81 ms
batch
119 ms
cTrvNaRi.html
76 ms
2-Q115_Wu_Com__1_Kroger_Fee_Agent_V1_D_728x90_EN_US.png
154 ms
pixel
141 ms
rum
68 ms
xrefid.xgi
43 ms
rt=ifr
106 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
73 ms
gpush.cogocast.net
88 ms
activeview
131 ms
activeview
130 ms
activeview
129 ms
activeview
139 ms
activeview
125 ms
activeview
48 ms
rt=ifr
52 ms
xrefid.xgi
8 ms
reviews.photographyreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
reviews.photographyreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
reviews.photographyreview.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviews.photographyreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Reviews.photographyreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviews.photographyreview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reviews Photographyreview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: