Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

121 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

230 ms

qipure.com screenshot

About Website

Visit qipure.com now to see the best up-to-date Qipure content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qipure.com

Visit qipure.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Qipure.com page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qipure.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.567

12/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

qipure.com

121 ms

purewellnessgroup.com

1474 ms

global_styles.css

352 ms

css

26 ms

form-limited-bootstrap.css

92 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Qipure.com, 34% (21 requests) were made to Purewellnessgroup.com and 30% (18 requests) were made to 96bda424cfcc34d9dd1a-0a7f10f87519dba22d2dbc6233a731e5.r41.cf2.rackcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Purewellnessgroup.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (34%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Qipure.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 30 B

  • Original 141 B
  • After minification 140 B
  • After compression 111 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30 B or 21% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 335.9 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Qipure needs image optimization as it can save up to 335.9 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 641.4 kB

  • Original 843.1 kB
  • After minification 676.1 kB
  • After compression 201.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 641.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 257.6 kB

  • Original 299.4 kB
  • After minification 239.9 kB
  • After compression 41.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qipure.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 257.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (54%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qipure. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

qipure.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

qipure.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

qipure.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qipure.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Qipure.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qipure. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: