Tools & Wizards About Us
quickfield.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

quickfield.com

QuickField support site

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

395 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

170 ms

quickfield.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Quick Field content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about quickfield.com

QuickField - simulation software for electromagnetics, heat transfer and stress analysis

Visit quickfield.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Quickfield.com page load time and found that the first response time was 395 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

quickfield.com performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

quickfield.com

395 ms

qf.css

71 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

248 ms

jcarousellite_1.0.1.min.js

151 ms

ga.js

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Quickfield.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Quickfield.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 122.7 kB (28%)

Content Size

444.3 kB

After Optimization

321.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Quickfield.com main page is 444.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 267.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 52.2 kB

  • Original 59.6 kB
  • After minification 53.5 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.2 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 267.1 kB
  • After minification 262.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Quick Field images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 60.1 kB

  • Original 110.3 kB
  • After minification 110.3 kB
  • After compression 50.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.1 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 7.4 kB
  • After minification 5.5 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Quickfield.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (62%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quick Field. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

quickfield.com

quickfield.com

395 ms

qf.css

qf.css

71 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

248 ms

jcarousellite_1.0.1.min.js

jcarousellite_1.0.1.min.js

151 ms

ga.js

ga.js

41 ms

one_video.php

one_video.php

192 ms

one_example.php

one_example.php

236 ms

one_customer.php

one_customer.php

248 ms

icon.png

icon.png

135 ms

title.png

title.png

136 ms

lang_en.png

lang_en.png

205 ms

lang_de.png

lang_de.png

206 ms

lang_dk.png

lang_dk.png

212 ms

lang_es.png

lang_es.png

251 ms

lang_fr.png

lang_fr.png

274 ms

lang_cz.png

lang_cz.png

275 ms

lang_it.png

lang_it.png

280 ms

lang_ru.png

lang_ru.png

297 ms

lang_ch.png

lang_ch.png

311 ms

search_left.png

search_left.png

322 ms

search_back.png

search_back.png

341 ms

btn_search.png

btn_search.png

343 ms

p_clear.png

p_clear.png

351 ms

main_menu_left.png

main_menu_left.png

364 ms

main_menu_back.png

main_menu_back.png

378 ms

product_menu.png

product_menu.png

387 ms

main_menu_spacer.png

main_menu_spacer.png

409 ms

solutions_menu.png

solutions_menu.png

411 ms

support_menu.png

support_menu.png

416 ms

h_spacer_.png

h_spacer_.png

433 ms

arrow_r_brown.png

arrow_r_brown.png

446 ms

download_menu.png

download_menu.png

456 ms

news_menu.png

news_menu.png

476 ms

contact_menu.png

contact_menu.png

477 ms

main_menu_right.png

main_menu_right.png

484 ms

slider_arrow_l.png

slider_arrow_l.png

501 ms

slider_arrow_r.png

slider_arrow_r.png

512 ms

download_p1.png

download_p1.png

522 ms

corner_tl.png

corner_tl.png

545 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

grad_v_white_gray.png

grad_v_white_gray.png

507 ms

corner_tr.png

corner_tr.png

423 ms

grad_h_gray_white.png

grad_h_gray_white.png

439 ms

video_icon.png

video_icon.png

416 ms

section4_title.png

section4_title.png

412 ms

grad_h_white_gray.png

grad_h_white_gray.png

414 ms

corner_bl.png

corner_bl.png

414 ms

grad_v_gray_white.png

grad_v_gray_white.png

414 ms

corner_br.png

corner_br.png

413 ms

examples_ico.png

examples_ico.png

408 ms

appl_icon.png

appl_icon.png

414 ms

blue_arrow.png

blue_arrow.png

411 ms

features_icon.png

features_icon.png

412 ms

h_spacer.png

h_spacer.png

413 ms

news_icon_small.png

news_icon_small.png

413 ms

customers_icon_small.png

customers_icon_small.png

409 ms

h_delimiter.png

h_delimiter.png

410 ms

tera_logo.png

tera_logo.png

414 ms

slide_application.jpg

slide_application.jpg

1294 ms

slide_qf61.jpg

slide_qf61.jpg

472 ms

slide_slogan.jpg

slide_slogan.jpg

545 ms

slide_support.jpg

slide_support.jpg

605 ms

webinar_qf61.png

webinar_qf61.png

415 ms

vertical_plate_model.png

vertical_plate_model.png

413 ms

Accessibility Review

quickfield.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

quickfield.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

quickfield.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Quickfield.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Quickfield.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

quickfield.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Quick Field. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: