4.7 sec in total
317 ms
3.9 sec
418 ms
Click here to check amazing Quuick content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about quuick.in
Quuick.in is a Web Designing and Development,Mobile App Development,Seo Services Company in india.We Offers E-Commerce Applications,WordPress WebSite Development.
Visit quuick.inWe analyzed Quuick.in page load time and found that the first response time was 317 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
quuick.in performance score
317 ms
198 ms
83 ms
83 ms
88 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Quuick.in, 5% (4 requests) were made to D2r55d1mdjn9e5.cloudfront.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to D2fbmx0ka58bdo.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source D2fbmx0ka58bdo.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 378.2 kB (32%)
1.2 MB
802.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Quuick.in main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 771.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Quuick needs image optimization as it can save up to 84.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 124.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 124.7 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 136.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Quuick.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 136.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (19%)
68
55
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quuick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
quuick.in
317 ms
bootstrap.min.css
198 ms
styles.css
83 ms
main.css
83 ms
responsive-tabs.css
88 ms
style.css
97 ms
css
60 ms
font-awesome.min.css
62 ms
DMCABadgeHelper.min.js
26 ms
jquery.min.js
300 ms
jquery.responsiveTabs.js
85 ms
bootstrap.min.js
299 ms
quuickjs.js
42 ms
validator.js
58 ms
contact.js
83 ms
analytics.js
378 ms
sprite3.svg
461 ms
DMCA_logo-grn-btn120w.png
133 ms
ico-fb.svg
409 ms
logo.png
326 ms
lhs-banner-bg.gif
138 ms
banner.jpg
324 ms
banner1.jpg
424 ms
banner2.jpg
325 ms
banner3.jpg
376 ms
h1.png
322 ms
h2.png
364 ms
h3.png
363 ms
h4.png
362 ms
h4b.png
362 ms
h5a.png
413 ms
h6a.png
411 ms
h4a.png
409 ms
h5.png
411 ms
h6.png
408 ms
h6b.png
439 ms
h8.png
437 ms
h7.png
441 ms
h9.png
436 ms
h10.png
434 ms
h11.png
441 ms
h12.png
477 ms
h13.png
478 ms
h14.png
477 ms
h15.png
483 ms
h16.png
486 ms
h17.png
479 ms
h21.png
508 ms
h22.png
510 ms
h18.png
509 ms
h19.png
519 ms
h20.png
524 ms
ico-tw.svg
376 ms
ico-google.svg
396 ms
ico-instagram.svg
403 ms
h121.png
436 ms
h122.png
461 ms
h123.png
459 ms
Gotham-Book.woff
2282 ms
GothamRoundedMedium_21022.ttf
3262 ms
h124.png
436 ms
h125.png
266 ms
f1.png
273 ms
f2.png
274 ms
collect
58 ms
f3.png
245 ms
f6.png
242 ms
f7.png
243 ms
f8.png
259 ms
f9.png
269 ms
widget_v2.176.js
12 ms
avatar_simple_visitor.png
246 ms
hbABjQBLsAhQWLEBAY5ZsUYGK1ghsBBZS7AUUlghsIBZHbAGK1xYWbAUKwAAAAFX9iB7AAA=
1 ms
quuick.in SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Quuick.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Quuick.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
quuick.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Quuick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: