Tools & Wizards About Us
callportal.robodial.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

callportal.robodial.org

Call Control Center

Page Load Speed

829 ms in total

First Response

138 ms

Resources Loaded

612 ms

Page Rendered

79 ms

callportal.robodial.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to callportal.robodial.org homepage info - get ready to check Call Portal Robodial best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about callportal.robodial.org

Visit callportal.robodial.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Callportal.robodial.org page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 691 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

callportal.robodial.org performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

41/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

callportal.robodial.org

138 ms

login.php

45 ms

callportal.css

39 ms

style.css

75 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.css

146 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Callportal.robodial.org, 13% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (188 ms) belongs to the original domain Callportal.robodial.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 192.9 kB (77%)

Content Size

251.3 kB

After Optimization

58.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Callportal.robodial.org main page is 251.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 168.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 4.9 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 748 B, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 32.8 kB
  • After minification 19.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Call Portal Robodial needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 41% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 138.3 kB

  • Original 168.7 kB
  • After minification 125.2 kB
  • After compression 30.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 37.6 kB

  • Original 44.9 kB
  • After minification 37.0 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Callportal.robodial.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (62%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Call Portal Robodial. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

callportal.robodial.org

callportal.robodial.org

138 ms

login.php

login.php

45 ms

callportal.css

callportal.css

39 ms

style.css

style.css

75 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.css

jquery-ui-1.8.23.custom.css

146 ms

jquery.ui.timepicker.css

jquery.ui.timepicker.css

111 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

69 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

90 ms

jquery.ui.timepicker.js

jquery.ui.timepicker.js

186 ms

jquery.qtip-1.0.0.min.js

jquery.qtip-1.0.0.min.js

186 ms

callportal.js

callportal.js

188 ms

date.js

date.js

185 ms

Header960x100.png

Header960x100.png

40 ms

helpicon.gif

helpicon.gif

41 ms

ui-bg_highlight-soft_25_336699_1x100.png

ui-bg_highlight-soft_25_336699_1x100.png

40 ms

Accessibility Review

callportal.robodial.org accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

callportal.robodial.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

callportal.robodial.org SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Callportal.robodial.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Callportal.robodial.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

callportal.robodial.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Call Portal Robodial. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: