4 sec in total
538 ms
3.3 sec
183 ms
Click here to check amazing DOCS RWU content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about docs.rwu.edu
This repository is a service of the University Libraries. The faculty and student research and scholarly output included here has been selected and deposited by the individual university departments a...
Visit docs.rwu.eduWe analyzed Docs.rwu.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 538 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
docs.rwu.edu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
26/100
10%
Value13.4 s
0/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value680 ms
44/100
30%
Value1.175
1/100
15%
Value11.2 s
20/100
10%
538 ms
22 ms
361 ms
357 ms
367 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Docs.rwu.edu, 8% (7 requests) were made to Cdn.embedly.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Yui.yahooapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Docs.rwu.edu.
Page size can be reduced by 715.7 kB (70%)
1.0 MB
304.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Docs.rwu.edu main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 452.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, DOCS RWU needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 258.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 258.3 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 370.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Docs.rwu.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 370.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (70%)
77
23
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DOCS RWU. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
docs.rwu.edu
538 ms
yui-min.js
22 ms
ir-style.css
361 ms
ir-custom.css
357 ms
ir-local.css
367 ms
jsUtilities.js
367 ms
footnoteLinks.js
368 ms
dc-mobile-nav.js
551 ms
jquery.min.js
91 ms
mobile-scale.js
533 ms
fastclick.js
725 ms
scroll.js
546 ms
fixed-responsive-nav.js
549 ms
hide-nav.js
547 ms
platform.js
16 ms
d3.v2.js
1560 ms
sunburst.pack.js
733 ms
rdr.js
731 ms
floatbox.css
367 ms
floatbox.js
938 ms
bpbootstrap-20131105.pack.js
571 ms
ir-reset.css
389 ms
ir-layout.css
608 ms
ir-assets.css
579 ms
ir-left.css
585 ms
ir-submit.css
603 ms
ir-article.css
803 ms
ir-feed.css
808 ms
ir-network.css
811 ms
ir-adapt.css
828 ms
dc-mobile-nav.css
830 ms
ir-deprecate.css
447 ms
global-alert.css
428 ms
grid.css
425 ms
ir-utilities.css
442 ms
combo
18 ms
f86dfd412967af8341549a5c584b2edd.png
214 ms
136419.png
214 ms
8e240588cf8cd3a028768d4294acd7d3.png
408 ms
019a699fb21c9c20dd9274e5e2120f0f.gif
215 ms
a26c020750f0f258a1da5d97ed0df6d1.gif
469 ms
2760866f54fcb6570a498f88de63eccf.gif
261 ms
cf1e60b6ab93bff127a9eca3244a962c.gif
360 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
573 ms
responsivenav.ttf
361 ms
a652ebbd024a0c7d463a741d4893f705.gif
445 ms
orn.gif
533 ms
disciplines.json
685 ms
json
903 ms
2682e679f0ac0c1ffe8090198797217a.gif
430 ms
ga.js
9 ms
options.js
459 ms
__utm.gif
34 ms
followable.css
514 ms
all.d95e2fd2.css
4 ms
all.d95e2fd2.js
12 ms
card-details
108 ms
favicon.ico
87 ms
media.html
71 ms
xcomm.html
87 ms
oxygen-bold-webfont.woff
64 ms
oxygen-regular-webfont.woff
67 ms
iframe_api
32 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
www-widgetapi.js
64 ms
collect
20 ms
X7woP00zVaM
81 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
6 ms
www-embed-player.js
27 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
31 ms
ad_status.js
30 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
24 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
24 ms
webservice-base-20131105.pack.js
229 ms
followable-20131105.pack.js
223 ms
combo
11 ms
core_534.js
434 ms
DC_Logo_small.svg
223 ms
combo
3 ms
combo
3 ms
combo
7 ms
followconfig.json
206 ms
ir-print.css
166 ms
tooltip_534.js
165 ms
docs.rwu.edu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
docs.rwu.edu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
docs.rwu.edu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Docs.rwu.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Docs.rwu.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
docs.rwu.edu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of DOCS RWU. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: