Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io

ECN Inline Checkout

Page Load Speed

919 ms in total

First Response

79 ms

Resources Loaded

723 ms

Page Rendered

117 ms

ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io homepage info - get ready to check ECN Inline Checkout Readme best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io

This page is password-protected.

Visit ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 840 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.5 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io

79 ms

ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io

89 ms

password

119 ms

bundle-hub.css

30 ms

bundle-hub.js

127 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io, 20% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 10% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (127 ms) belongs to the original domain Ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.2 kB (47%)

Content Size

76.8 kB

After Optimization

40.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io main page is 76.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 46.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 36.2 kB

  • Original 46.9 kB
  • After minification 46.8 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 29.9 kB
  • After minification 29.9 kB
  • After compression 29.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ECN Inline Checkout Readme. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ecn-inline-checkout.readme.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ECN Inline Checkout Readme. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: