Tools & Wizards About Us
raaf.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

raaf.org

Just another WordPress site

Page Load Speed

809 ms in total

First Response

201 ms

Resources Loaded

463 ms

Page Rendered

145 ms

raaf.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Raaf content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about raaf.org

Sabrina Raaf is a new media artist who works with responsive environments, site-specific + public installations, and robotics.

Visit raaf.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Raaf.org page load time and found that the first response time was 201 ms and then it took 608 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

raaf.org performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value730 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

raaf.org

201 ms

undodefaults.css

5 ms

main.css

6 ms

sections.css

9 ms

menu.css

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Raaf.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (252 ms) belongs to the original domain Raaf.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 14.1 kB (11%)

Content Size

126.4 kB

After Optimization

112.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Raaf.org main page is 126.4 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 108.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 2.8 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB
  • After compression 1.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 514 B, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 147 B

  • Original 108.8 kB
  • After minification 108.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Raaf images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 12.2 kB

  • Original 14.7 kB
  • After minification 8.2 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raaf.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (60%)

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

2

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raaf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

raaf.org

raaf.org

201 ms

undodefaults.css

undodefaults.css

5 ms

main.css

main.css

6 ms

sections.css

sections.css

9 ms

menu.css

menu.css

7 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

8 ms

raaf_mccormick_sketch_1.jpg

raaf_mccormick_sketch_1.jpg

252 ms

Accessibility Review

raaf.org accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

raaf.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

raaf.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raaf.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Raaf.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

raaf.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Raaf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: