Tools & Wizards About Us
racker82.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

racker82.de

STRATO - Domain not available

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

158 ms

racker82.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to racker82.de homepage info - get ready to check Racker 82 best content right away, or after learning these important things about racker82.de

Racker82 - der hei�este Kegelclub on Earth!!

Visit racker82.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Racker82.de page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

racker82.de performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.6 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

racker82.de

1573 ms

default.css

243 ms

slimbox.css

256 ms

default.js

246 ms

jcomments-v2.1.js

355 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Racker82.de and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Racker82.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 163.6 kB (54%)

Content Size

302.2 kB

After Optimization

138.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Racker82.de main page is 302.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 125.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 15.8 kB

  • Original 19.4 kB
  • After minification 17.4 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 113.9 kB
  • After minification 95.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Racker 82 needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 92.2 kB

  • Original 125.9 kB
  • After minification 118.5 kB
  • After compression 33.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 92.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 36.9 kB

  • Original 43.1 kB
  • After minification 28.2 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Racker82.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (79%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Racker 82. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

racker82.de

racker82.de

1573 ms

default.css

default.css

243 ms

slimbox.css

slimbox.css

256 ms

default.js

default.js

246 ms

jcomments-v2.1.js

jcomments-v2.1.js

355 ms

ajax.js

ajax.js

249 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

670 ms

caption.js

caption.js

345 ms

slimbox.js

slimbox.js

457 ms

system.css

system.css

367 ms

general.css

general.css

370 ms

template.css

template.css

703 ms

script.js

script.js

470 ms

Page-BgTexture.jpg

Page-BgTexture.jpg

128 ms

Sheet-s.png

Sheet-s.png

127 ms

Sheet-h.png

Sheet-h.png

126 ms

Sheet-v.png

Sheet-v.png

125 ms

Sheet-c.png

Sheet-c.png

119 ms

Header.jpg

Header.jpg

401 ms

Block-s.png

Block-s.png

227 ms

Block-h.png

Block-h.png

232 ms

Block-v.png

Block-v.png

238 ms

BlockHeaderIcon.png

BlockHeaderIcon.png

238 ms

BlockContent-s.png

BlockContent-s.png

231 ms

BlockContent-h.png

BlockContent-h.png

335 ms

BlockContent-v.png

BlockContent-v.png

335 ms

Button.png

Button.png

336 ms

Post-s.png

Post-s.png

342 ms

Post-h.png

Post-h.png

346 ms

Post-v.png

Post-v.png

438 ms

250x277-images-stories-racker-rackercollage.gif

250x277-images-stories-racker-rackercollage.gif

636 ms

BlockContentBullets.png

BlockContentBullets.png

447 ms

icon_lol.gif

icon_lol.gif

459 ms

Footer.png

Footer.png

452 ms

Accessibility Review

racker82.de accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

racker82.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

racker82.de SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    SV

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Racker82.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swedish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Racker82.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

racker82.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Racker 82. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: