3 sec in total
244 ms
2.5 sec
216 ms
Click here to check amazing Rae content for Saudi Arabia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rae.sa
روابط التكنولوجيا لتقنية المعلومات شركة متخصصه بتأجير السيرفرات و باستضافة وبرمجة وتطوير المواقع و البرمجيات
Visit rae.saWe analyzed Rae.sa page load time and found that the first response time was 244 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
rae.sa performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value2.3 s
99/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.053
98/100
15%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
244 ms
586 ms
8 ms
154 ms
197 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rae.sa, 92% (83 requests) were made to Tl4t.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (821 ms) relates to the external source Tl4t.com.
Page size can be reduced by 521.7 kB (33%)
1.6 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Rae.sa main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.1 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.8 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 147.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rae needs image optimization as it can save up to 147.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 204.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 204.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 105.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rae.sa needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 105.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (12%)
85
75
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rae. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rae.sa
244 ms
www.tl4t.com
586 ms
ga.js
8 ms
style-ar.css
154 ms
jquery-1.js
197 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
78 ms
organictabs.jquery.js
79 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
80 ms
easySlider1.7.js
140 ms
slides.min.jquery.js
150 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
jqueryui.js
288 ms
style.css
136 ms
ui.all.css
226 ms
script.js
200 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
160 ms
jquery.nav.min.js
166 ms
traidnt-6520.png
565 ms
shadow_bd.jpg
114 ms
offers_top_bg.png
149 ms
translation_en.png
76 ms
arrow_cart.png
77 ms
login_icon2.png
77 ms
chat_icon.png
78 ms
question_icon.png
155 ms
logo.png
189 ms
home.png
153 ms
all.png
226 ms
opacity1_bg.png
187 ms
menu2.jpg
295 ms
menu1.jpg
301 ms
menu3.jpg
302 ms
menu4.jpg
335 ms
menu5.jpg
338 ms
menu6.jpg
376 ms
menu8.jpg
443 ms
menu9.jpg
449 ms
menu10.jpg
451 ms
menu11.jpg
520 ms
search_for_domain_bg.png
412 ms
search-titleA.png
451 ms
search-inputBg.png
488 ms
search-butGo.png
518 ms
busi_icon.png
523 ms
ourwork_icon.png
526 ms
adv_icon.png
527 ms
icon_con.png
598 ms
loading.gif
594 ms
ar-1.jpg
742 ms
ar-unlimited.JPG
782 ms
ar-7.jpg
821 ms
icon7.png
667 ms
news_title.png
667 ms
like.php
167 ms
icon9.png
654 ms
search_title.png
673 ms
icon4.png
678 ms
icon2.png
762 ms
icon3.png
745 ms
body_icon_a.jpg
712 ms
body_icon_e.jpg
713 ms
body_icon_f.png
707 ms
arrow_f.png
713 ms
right_grid.png
725 ms
orange_grid.jpg
707 ms
TY3MhkXpWJ-.js
36 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
24 ms
cards_bg.png
674 ms
tabs_bg.png
818 ms
tab_more.png
638 ms
icons2_allll.png
749 ms
block_grid.jpg
650 ms
block_shadow.png
632 ms
offers_grid2.jpg
600 ms
chose_plan_title_bg.png
637 ms
offers_bg2.png
613 ms
arrow_f2.png
632 ms
order_btn.png
636 ms
partners.png
760 ms
bg_footer.gif
635 ms
dotli.png
636 ms
logo2.png
673 ms
NHtabsSel01.png
632 ms
arrow-prev.png
664 ms
arrow-next.png
636 ms
bullets.png
632 ms
Offline.png
77 ms
btn_prev.png
566 ms
btn_next.png
597 ms
Offline.png
689 ms
rae.sa accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
rae.sa best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rae.sa SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
AR
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rae.sa can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Arabic is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rae.sa main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rae.sa
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rae. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: