Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

rae.sa

تم تعليق النطاق | Domain suspended

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

244 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

216 ms

rae.sa screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rae content for Saudi Arabia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rae.sa

روابط التكنولوجيا لتقنية المعلومات شركة متخصصه بتأجير السيرفرات و باستضافة وبرمجة وتطوير المواقع و البرمجيات

Visit rae.sa

Key Findings

We analyzed Rae.sa page load time and found that the first response time was 244 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rae.sa performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

83/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.053

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rae.sa

244 ms

www.tl4t.com

586 ms

ga.js

8 ms

style-ar.css

154 ms

jquery-1.js

197 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rae.sa, 92% (83 requests) were made to Tl4t.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (821 ms) relates to the external source Tl4t.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 521.7 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Rae.sa main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 64.8 kB

  • Original 74.8 kB
  • After minification 47.7 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.1 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 147.3 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 929.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rae needs image optimization as it can save up to 147.3 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 204.3 kB

  • Original 283.6 kB
  • After minification 265.4 kB
  • After compression 79.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 204.3 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 105.4 kB

  • Original 125.6 kB
  • After minification 101.7 kB
  • After compression 20.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rae.sa needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 105.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (12%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

75

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rae. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rae.sa accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

rae.sa best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rae.sa SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    AR

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rae.sa can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Arabic is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rae.sa main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rae. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: