974 ms in total
186 ms
545 ms
243 ms
Visit ragstock.com now to see the best up-to-date Ragstock content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ragstock.com
Shop online or find a Ragstock store near you for vintage clothing from the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90 plus affordable new fashions for men and women.
Visit ragstock.comWe analyzed Ragstock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 186 ms and then it took 788 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
ragstock.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value2,030 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.3
39/100
15%
Value15.0 s
8/100
10%
186 ms
121 ms
14 ms
18 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Ragstock.com, 93% (74 requests) were made to 35f0jq1fcotly82b3o727xi0.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (186 ms) belongs to the original domain Ragstock.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (65%)
2.0 MB
714.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Ragstock.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 96.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ragstock images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 260.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 260.2 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 950.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ragstock.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 950.3 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (85%)
75
11
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ragstock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ragstock.com
186 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
121 ms
main.css
14 ms
scr_style.css
18 ms
storefront-top-bar.css
19 ms
optimized-social-share-buttons.css
19 ms
ct.sizeguide.css
17 ms
ct.sizeguide.style1.css
18 ms
magnific.popup.css
22 ms
converter.css
21 ms
style.css
23 ms
name-your-price.css
21 ms
swatches-and-photos.css
21 ms
style.css
23 ms
style.css
37 ms
variation-swatches.css
32 ms
font-awesome.min.css
32 ms
gmw.css
35 ms
style.css
33 ms
style.css
37 ms
js_composer.min.css
52 ms
shiftnav.min.css
90 ms
woocommerce.css
92 ms
ubermenu.min.css
37 ms
blackwhite.css
40 ms
font-awesome.min.css
42 ms
ragstock.com
116 ms
font-awesome.min.css
47 ms
standard-dark.css
45 ms
style.css
45 ms
cart_customize_style.css
120 ms
dropdown_list_customize_style.css
119 ms
widget_customize_style.css
118 ms
popup_customize_style.css
125 ms
jquery.js
93 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
92 ms
scr_js.js
92 ms
magnific.popup.js
93 ms
ct.sg.front.js
94 ms
script.js
89 ms
clear_storage.js
88 ms
core.min.js
75 ms
widget.min.js
74 ms
button.min.js
75 ms
spinner.min.js
76 ms
main.min.js
77 ms
popup.js
76 ms
general.js
77 ms
cart_in_menu.js
78 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
79 ms
woocommerce.min.js
79 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
76 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
76 ms
swatches-and-photos.js
75 ms
navigation.min.js
74 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.min.js
74 ms
jquery.colorbox.min.js
71 ms
bj-lazy-load.min.js
70 ms
ubermenu.min.js
72 ms
shiftnav.min.js
68 ms
wp-embed.min.js
67 ms
money.min.js
65 ms
accounting.min.js
31 ms
conversion.js
28 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
25 ms
ga.js
157 ms
ragstock-logo.png
5 ms
icon11.png
20 ms
icon11.png
20 ms
icon-2.png
20 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
21 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
20 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
20 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
20 ms
__utm.gif
24 ms
Ragstock-Crop-Tees-And-Tanks-Frontpage-Image.jpg
8 ms
roundtrip.js
13 ms
2015.3.12-Vintage-One-Of-A-Kind-Banner2.jpg
9 ms
2015.10.19-Boot-Banner.jpg
9 ms
2015.10.12-CatDog-Purse-Web-Banner.jpg
8 ms
ragstock.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ragstock.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ragstock.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ragstock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ragstock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ragstock.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ragstock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: