Tools & Wizards About Us
raincollector.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 57

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

raincollector.com

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

253 ms

Resources Loaded

842 ms

Page Rendered

180 ms

raincollector.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Raincollector content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about raincollector.com

Visit raincollector.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Raincollector.com page load time and found that the first response time was 253 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

raincollector.com performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.1 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

raincollector.com

253 ms

bootstrap.min.css

178 ms

css

26 ms

css

36 ms

font-awesome.min.css

152 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Raincollector.com, 39% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (397 ms) belongs to the original domain Raincollector.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 297.6 kB (48%)

Content Size

623.3 kB

After Optimization

325.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Raincollector.com main page is 623.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 263.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 750 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 710 B, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 16.8 kB

  • Original 263.7 kB
  • After minification 246.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Raincollector images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 101.1 kB

  • Original 148.7 kB
  • After minification 145.9 kB
  • After compression 47.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 101.1 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 177.9 kB

  • Original 208.3 kB
  • After minification 206.3 kB
  • After compression 30.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raincollector.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 177.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (77%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raincollector. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

raincollector.com

raincollector.com

253 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

178 ms

css

css

26 ms

css

css

36 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

152 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

130 ms

creative.css

creative.css

131 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

193 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

132 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

218 ms

jquery.fittext.js

jquery.fittext.js

218 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

219 ms

creative.js

creative.js

220 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

397 ms

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf

6 ms

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nvzeo8SCrGyBsNQUDsw2Qr8.ttf

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nvzeo8SCrGyBsNQUDsw2Qr8.ttf

10 ms

RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

12 ms

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngV_pQ1T3xN3K1c3sB361us.ttf

ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngV_pQ1T3xN3K1c3sB361us.ttf

8 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

8 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

7 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

8 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

9 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

9 ms

Accessibility Review

raincollector.com accessibility score

57

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

raincollector.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

raincollector.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raincollector.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Raincollector.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

raincollector.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Raincollector. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: