4.8 sec in total
530 ms
3.8 sec
451 ms
Click here to check amazing Random Lab content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about random-lab.io
Une technologie sur-mesure à découvrir sans plus attendre. Grâce à Random-Lab.io, le futur s'installe chez vous.
Visit random-lab.ioWe analyzed Random-lab.io page load time and found that the first response time was 530 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
random-lab.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value430 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.045
99/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
530 ms
2010 ms
171 ms
253 ms
254 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Random-lab.io, 28% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Random-lab.io.
Page size can be reduced by 173.4 kB (19%)
903.7 kB
730.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Random-lab.io main page is 903.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 333.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 167.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 167.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Random Lab images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 168 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 896 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Random-lab.io has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (82%)
57
10
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Random Lab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
random-lab.io
530 ms
random-lab.io
2010 ms
style.min.css
171 ms
wplc-plugin-public.css
253 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
254 ms
style.min.css
254 ms
theme.min.css
255 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
262 ms
post-4.css
265 ms
frontend.min.css
337 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
337 ms
swiper.min.css
339 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
340 ms
global.css
347 ms
post-1464.css
350 ms
post-1884.css
420 ms
post-1946.css
422 ms
css
35 ms
fontawesome.min.css
508 ms
solid.min.css
423 ms
regular.min.css
432 ms
brands.min.css
437 ms
jquery.min.js
590 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
506 ms
widget-mega-menu.min.css
507 ms
widget-loop-builder.min.css
440 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
447 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
556 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
556 ms
widget-posts.min.css
556 ms
post-2020.css
566 ms
post-2304.css
566 ms
e-gallery.min.css
604 ms
animations.min.css
604 ms
callus.js
858 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
604 ms
complianz.min.js
620 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
643 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
689 ms
e-gallery.min.js
600 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
521 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
526 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
625 ms
hooks.min.js
601 ms
i18n.min.js
593 ms
frontend.min.js
594 ms
waypoints.min.js
528 ms
core.min.js
603 ms
frontend.min.js
603 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
604 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
600 ms
Logo-entier-paysage-1-1024x199.png
350 ms
Logo-seul-controle-dacces-1024x1024.png
408 ms
Logo-seul-alarme-1024x1024.png
491 ms
Logo-seul-videosurveillance-1024x1024.png
495 ms
Logo-seul-1-q7bjwhvyp6x99ywduj7mf6npmkcr6b05xbu9desmn4.png
492 ms
4-Retouche-RandomLab-Showroom-67-1024x683.jpg
501 ms
Surveillance-distance-random-lab-300x207.png
526 ms
3-Retouche-RandomLab-Showroom-98-300x200.jpg
493 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
51 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
54 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
52 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
52 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
52 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
51 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
54 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
54 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
54 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
633 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
548 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
54 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
54 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
76 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
76 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
75 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
75 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
73 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
74 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
78 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
76 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
78 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
78 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
77 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
77 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
78 ms
eicons.woff
530 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
613 ms
random-lab.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
[lang] attributes do not have a valid value
random-lab.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
random-lab.io SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
FR
![]()
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Random-lab.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Random-lab.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
random-lab.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Random Lab. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: