Tools & Wizards About Us
rangefinderforum.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

rangefinderforum.com

Home | Rangefinderforum

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

499 ms

Resources Loaded

664 ms

Page Rendered

302 ms

rangefinderforum.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rangefinderforum content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rangefinderforum.com

Rangefinderforum.com is a site for Rangefinder Camera enthusiasts

Visit rangefinderforum.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rangefinderforum.com page load time and found that the first response time was 499 ms and then it took 966 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rangefinderforum.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,840 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.8 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rangefinderforum.com

499 ms

vbulletin_global.js

7 ms

vbulletin_menu.js

6 ms

bg.gif

6 ms

header_back.gif

4 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Rangefinderforum.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.viglink.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (499 ms) belongs to the original domain Rangefinderforum.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 382.4 kB (27%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Rangefinderforum.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 66.1 kB

  • Original 77.7 kB
  • After minification 74.4 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 256.2 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 981.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rangefinderforum needs image optimization as it can save up to 256.2 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 60.1 kB

  • Original 100.4 kB
  • After minification 67.9 kB
  • After compression 40.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.1 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (30%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

49

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rangefinderforum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rangefinderforum.com

rangefinderforum.com

499 ms

vbulletin_global.js

vbulletin_global.js

7 ms

vbulletin_menu.js

vbulletin_menu.js

6 ms

bg.gif

bg.gif

6 ms

header_back.gif

header_back.gif

4 ms

header_logo.gif

header_logo.gif

11 ms

nav_background.gif

nav_background.gif

6 ms

nav_div.gif

nav_div.gif

13 ms

vbulletin_md5.js

vbulletin_md5.js

7 ms

nav_btm.gif

nav_btm.gif

22 ms

nav_shadow.gif

nav_shadow.gif

4 ms

navbits_start.gif

navbits_start.gif

3 ms

collapse_tcat.gif

collapse_tcat.gif

4 ms

popflash_left.jpg

popflash_left.jpg

19 ms

cq_side.gif

cq_side.gif

17 ms

rapidwinderSide.gif

rapidwinderSide.gif

17 ms

precision2_left.gif

precision2_left.gif

17 ms

gordy.png

gordy.png

18 ms

p1.gif

p1.gif

19 ms

g_draft4.png

g_draft4.png

18 ms

strip_back.gif

strip_back.gif

7 ms

cat_back.gif

cat_back.gif

5 ms

insertimage.gif

insertimage.gif

16 ms

sml_U542I1098419674.SEQ.0.jpg

sml_U542I1098419674.SEQ.0.jpg

117 ms

thread_hot.gif

thread_hot.gif

9 ms

multipage.gif

multipage.gif

5 ms

paperclip.gif

paperclip.gif

6 ms

clear_dot.gif

clear_dot.gif

8 ms

lastpost.gif

lastpost.gif

6 ms

poll_posticon.gif

poll_posticon.gif

11 ms

thread.gif

thread.gif

8 ms

sml_U524I1097894579.SEQ.0.jpg

sml_U524I1097894579.SEQ.0.jpg

55 ms

sml_U666I1097867638.SEQ.0.jpg

sml_U666I1097867638.SEQ.0.jpg

9 ms

sml_U235I1097832536.SEQ.0.jpg

sml_U235I1097832536.SEQ.0.jpg

91 ms

IMG_1776_zpszn9wfihr.jpg

IMG_1776_zpszn9wfihr.jpg

20 ms

Leica_14494_BC_SCL2_Battery_Charger_1368550328000_894882.jpg

Leica_14494_BC_SCL2_Battery_Charger_1368550328000_894882.jpg

19 ms

image2.jpeg

image2.jpeg

19 ms

image1.jpeg

image1.jpeg

54 ms

1375391162000_986281.jpg

1375391162000_986281.jpg

20 ms

DSC_0005.JPG

DSC_0005.JPG

22 ms

NSN_11.jpg

NSN_11.jpg

21 ms

IMG_0236.JPG

IMG_0236.JPG

97 ms

DRD99851.jpg

DRD99851.jpg

22 ms

01_color_heliar_75.jpg

01_color_heliar_75.jpg

84 ms

vglnk.js

vglnk.js

28 ms

leica-x-typ-113-three-quarter-top.jpg

leica-x-typ-113-three-quarter-top.jpg

16 ms

571.JPG

571.JPG

15 ms

IMG_0284.JPG

IMG_0284.JPG

19 ms

R0002258.jpg

R0002258.jpg

19 ms

L1010030.jpg

L1010030.jpg

16 ms

P1130036.jpg

P1130036.jpg

91 ms

nikkor-h_c-3.jpg

nikkor-h_c-3.jpg

92 ms

leica90_1.jpg

leica90_1.jpg

20 ms

LEICA35_1.jpg

LEICA35_1.jpg

40 ms

rings-43.jpg

rings-43.jpg

41 ms

VoigtSL2_58a.jpg

VoigtSL2_58a.jpg

42 ms

625296937_FUJIE2BODYONLY.jpg

625296937_FUJIE2BODYONLY.jpg

43 ms

zhou_M8_b2z.jpg

zhou_M8_b2z.jpg

81 ms

voigt_NEX_CU_04.jpg

voigt_NEX_CU_04.jpg

48 ms

MONOCHROM1.jpg

MONOCHROM1.jpg

133 ms

rings-1-3.jpg

rings-1-3.jpg

75 ms

rings-12.jpg

rings-12.jpg

78 ms

gifportada.gif

gifportada.gif

91 ms

rings-12-2.jpg

rings-12-2.jpg

157 ms

footer_ls.gif

footer_ls.gif

85 ms

footer_x.gif

footer_x.gif

94 ms

clear.gif

clear.gif

89 ms

footer_rs.gif

footer_rs.gif

95 ms

cq_top.gif

cq_top.gif

10 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

5 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

6 ms

Accessibility Review

rangefinderforum.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

rangefinderforum.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rangefinderforum.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rangefinderforum.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rangefinderforum.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

rangefinderforum.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rangefinderforum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: