Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

ranktracker.com

Ranktracker:

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

466 ms

Resources Loaded

944 ms

Page Rendered

370 ms

ranktracker.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ranktracker content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ranktracker.com

Ranktracker the all-in-one platform for effective SEO. ⚡ Find keywords, track website ranking, analyze SERPs and audit your website using world-class data. ⚡

Visit ranktracker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ranktracker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 466 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ranktracker.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value680 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.038

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

53/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ranktracker.com

466 ms

frontend-52d657c4068e22d329c49027765ce95ecca5fbecb73042ac257102d5b686e9a9.css

67 ms

frontend-8d180dfc435b91209cb78a1fca4bc5c2a7e85870b8d895a1026805386c245a44.js

106 ms

jsapi

48 ms

ga.js

84 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ranktracker.com, 73% (11 requests) were made to D1pbo8lcy58i3z.cloudfront.net and 7% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (466 ms) belongs to the original domain Ranktracker.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 270.3 kB (33%)

Content Size

828.6 kB

After Optimization

558.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Ranktracker.com main page is 828.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 468.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 18.8 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 468.8 kB
  • After minification 456.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ranktracker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 133.4 kB

  • Original 207.7 kB
  • After minification 202.6 kB
  • After compression 74.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 133.4 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 111.5 kB

  • Original 133.3 kB
  • After minification 132.6 kB
  • After compression 21.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ranktracker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 111.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (21%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ranktracker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ranktracker.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

ranktracker.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ranktracker.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ranktracker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ranktracker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ranktracker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: