2.2 sec in total
435 ms
1.5 sec
252 ms
Welcome to rapidget.net homepage info - get ready to check Rapidget best content right away, or after learning these important things about rapidget.net
rapidget.net is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, rapidget.net has it all. We hope you find w...
Visit rapidget.netWe analyzed Rapidget.net page load time and found that the first response time was 435 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
rapidget.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value5.6 s
18/100
25%
Value5.9 s
49/100
10%
Value570 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.298
40/100
15%
Value5.5 s
71/100
10%
435 ms
257 ms
365 ms
239 ms
332 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Rapidget.net, 22% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to D7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (515 ms) belongs to the original domain Rapidget.net.
Page size can be reduced by 150.4 kB (37%)
403.7 kB
253.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Rapidget.net main page is 403.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 200.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rapidget images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 109.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rapidget.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (54%)
35
16
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rapidget. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rapidget.net
435 ms
style.css
257 ms
jquery.main.js
365 ms
jquery.matchHeight.js
239 ms
bookmark_button.js
332 ms
line-button.js
422 ms
in.js
5 ms
button-only@2x.png
185 ms
top_image.jpg
511 ms
sample_photo1.jpg
398 ms
sample_photo2.jpg
327 ms
sample_photo3.jpg
515 ms
main_content.jpg
398 ms
platform.js
128 ms
293 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
67 ms
btn.js
52 ms
button
9 ms
button.css
90 ms
shared.js
91 ms
button.js
92 ms
sprite_connect_v14.png
187 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
33 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
75 ms
fastbutton
129 ms
pocket_button.png
49 ms
postmessageRelay
84 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
39 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
40 ms
reset.css
15 ms
entry-button.css
12 ms
bbtn-l_v3.png
7 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
59 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
40 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
4 ms
82x20.png
197 ms
rapidget.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
rapidget.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Uses deprecated APIs
rapidget.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rapidget.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Japanese language. Our system also found out that Rapidget.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rapidget.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rapidget. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: