4 sec in total
823 ms
2.2 sec
976 ms
Visit rarefilm.net now to see the best up-to-date Rare Film content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rarefilm.net
Visit rarefilm.netWe analyzed Rarefilm.net page load time and found that the first response time was 823 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
rarefilm.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value1.9 s
98/100
25%
Value4.1 s
80/100
10%
Value850 ms
34/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.2 s
32/100
10%
823 ms
267 ms
430 ms
630 ms
591 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Rarefilm.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (823 ms) belongs to the original domain Rarefilm.net.
Page size can be reduced by 347.4 kB (39%)
879.9 kB
532.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Rarefilm.net main page is 879.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 443.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rare Film images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 154.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 154.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 140.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rarefilm.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 140.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (16%)
32
27
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rare Film. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rarefilm.net
823 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
267 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
430 ms
style.css
630 ms
jquery.js
591 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
375 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
493 ms
front.js
353 ms
tie-scripts.js
590 ms
body-bg7.png
271 ms
main-menu-bg.png
212 ms
Le-dossier-51-Michel-Deville-1978-216x300.jpg
328 ms
Lawa.-Opowiesc-o-Dziadach-Adama-Mickiewicza-Tadeusz-Konwicki-1989-198x300.jpg
358 ms
La-chasse-aux-papillons-Otar-Iosseliani-1992-220x300.jpg
172 ms
Hochmat-HaBeygale-AKA-Wisdom-of-the-Pretzel-2002-200x300.jpg
242 ms
Shiqi-sui-de-dan-che-AKA-Beijing-Bicycle-2001-219x300.jpg
324 ms
Piate-Nie-odchodz-AKA-Fanciful-2014-200x300.jpg
356 ms
Foucault-Against-Himself-2014-206x300.jpg
379 ms
Suture-1993-202x300.jpg
413 ms
Ohthes-AKA-Riverbanks-2015-210x300.jpg
486 ms
Toutes-les-nuits-AKA-Every-Night-2001-225x300.jpg
519 ms
stripe.png
488 ms
sidebar-bullet.png
486 ms
O-Signo-da-Cidade-2007-218x300.jpg
542 ms
Interno-di-un-convento-1978-212x300.jpeg
556 ms
Malizia-1973-211x300.jpg
732 ms
Caravan-1946-200x300.jpg
643 ms
Szabadeses-AKA-Free-Fall-2014-209x300.jpg
658 ms
Saraband-for-Dead-Lovers-1948-197x300.jpg
679 ms
Senza-pieta-1948-203x300.jpg
701 ms
Plagio-1969-161x300.jpg
729 ms
hit
255 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
79 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMQFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
79 ms
BebasNeue-webfont.woff
805 ms
tiefontello.svg
783 ms
tiefontello.woff
803 ms
hit
130 ms
rarefilm.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rarefilm.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Uses deprecated APIs
rarefilm.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rarefilm.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rarefilm.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rarefilm.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rare Film. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: