Tools & Wizards About Us
raritystamps.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

raritystamps.com

双彩网(中国)·官方网站App Store

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

480 ms

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

179 ms

raritystamps.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to raritystamps.com homepage info - get ready to check Raritystamps best content right away, or after learning these important things about raritystamps.com

欢迎访问人气最高的双彩网官方网站【L6】为您提供双彩网APP、双彩网手机通用版下载、双彩网真人最新网址、双彩网登陆入口、双彩网真人24h在线服务期待您的加入。

Visit raritystamps.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Raritystamps.com page load time and found that the first response time was 480 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

raritystamps.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value45.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.063

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

raritystamps.com

480 ms

www.raritystamps.com

1540 ms

318 ms

package-sf.css

412 ms

package-sf.js

699 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Raritystamps.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Code.etracker.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Raritystamps.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 521.6 kB (63%)

Content Size

823.3 kB

After Optimization

301.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Raritystamps.com main page is 823.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 431.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 38.3 kB
  • After minification 34.1 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 556 B

  • Original 97.1 kB
  • After minification 96.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Raritystamps images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 281.6 kB

  • Original 431.5 kB
  • After minification 430.8 kB
  • After compression 149.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 281.6 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 210.2 kB

  • Original 256.4 kB
  • After minification 225.2 kB
  • After compression 46.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raritystamps.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 210.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (65%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raritystamps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

raritystamps.com

raritystamps.com

480 ms

www.raritystamps.com

www.raritystamps.com

1540 ms

318 ms

package-sf.css

package-sf.css

412 ms

package-sf.js

package-sf.js

699 ms

StorefrontStyle_247.css

StorefrontStyle_247.css

428 ms

style-ie.css

style-ie.css

282 ms

en-GB.js

en-GB.js

273 ms

EUR.js

EUR.js

291 ms

string.js

string.js

286 ms

browser.js

browser.js

288 ms

scope.js

scope.js

287 ms

json.js

json.js

539 ms

base64.js

base64.js

540 ms

inject-sec-token.js

inject-sec-token.js

541 ms

cookie.js

cookie.js

542 ms

button.js

button.js

530 ms

draggable.js

draggable.js

531 ms

resizable.js

resizable.js

796 ms

$pub.js

$pub.js

797 ms

class.js

class.js

798 ms

mime.js

mime.js

803 ms

$dict.js

$dict.js

802 ms

core.js

core.js

803 ms

support.js

support.js

1062 ms

$tmpl.js

$tmpl.js

1063 ms

load.js

load.js

1059 ms

touch.js

touch.js

1071 ms

version.js

version.js

1072 ms

validate.js

validate.js

1070 ms

storage.js

storage.js

1330 ms

de_epages.js

de_epages.js

1328 ms

bgr_layout.png

bgr_layout.png

1223 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

1099 ms

en_GB.gif

en_GB.gif

1103 ms

es_ES.gif

es_ES.gif

1106 ms

30.jpg

30.jpg

1666 ms

PayPalProLogo.gif

PayPalProLogo.gif

1368 ms

Scan009-2_h.jpg

Scan009-2_h.jpg

1488 ms

Scan0614_-_copia_2_h.jpg

Scan0614_-_copia_2_h.jpg

1417 ms

Scan0659_-_copia_6_h.jpg

Scan0659_-_copia_6_h.jpg

1397 ms

bgr_header.jpg

bgr_header.jpg

1497 ms

bgr_top.gif

bgr_top.gif

1646 ms

bgr_topbutton.gif

bgr_topbutton.gif

1665 ms

bgr_left.gif

bgr_left.gif

1697 ms

bgr_boxbody.gif

bgr_boxbody.gif

1758 ms

bgr_box.gif

bgr_box.gif

1790 ms

ico_s_search.png

ico_s_search.png

1897 ms

ga.js

ga.js

5 ms

inpage_linkid.js

inpage_linkid.js

2 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

suggest.js

suggest.js

1675 ms

$ready.js

$ready.js

1680 ms

energylabel.js

energylabel.js

1713 ms

utf8.js

utf8.js

1770 ms

bgr_right.gif

bgr_right.gif

1811 ms

img_actionlink.png

img_actionlink.png

1921 ms

bgr_content.png

bgr_content.png

1672 ms

bgr_separatorimage.gif

bgr_separatorimage.gif

1688 ms

bgr_hotdealimage.gif

bgr_hotdealimage.gif

1726 ms

ico_s_printer.png

ico_s_printer.png

1764 ms

dict.en.json

dict.en.json

1804 ms

bgr_bottom.gif

bgr_bottom.gif

1926 ms

dictionary.en.json

dictionary.en.json

537 ms

img_tree_empty.png

img_tree_empty.png

530 ms

img_tree_plus.png

img_tree_plus.png

557 ms

a.js

a.js

540 ms

Accessibility Review

raritystamps.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

raritystamps.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

raritystamps.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raritystamps.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Raritystamps.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

raritystamps.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Raritystamps. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: