3.2 sec in total
1 sec
1.9 sec
225 ms
Click here to check amazing Ratings King content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ratingsking.com
Visit ratingsking.comWe analyzed Ratingsking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
ratingsking.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value2.3 s
92/100
25%
Value2.3 s
98/100
10%
Value540 ms
54/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value9.9 s
27/100
10%
1041 ms
35 ms
55 ms
59 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Ratingsking.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ratingsking.com.
Page size can be reduced by 754.1 kB (51%)
1.5 MB
733.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Ratingsking.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 654.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 123.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ratings King needs image optimization as it can save up to 123.0 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 372.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 372.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 247.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ratingsking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 247.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (36%)
78
50
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ratings King. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ratingsking.com
1041 ms
styles.css
35 ms
prettyPhoto.css
55 ms
overlay-apple.css
59 ms
formular.css
59 ms
tipsy.css
79 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
10 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
100 ms
jquery.easing.js
101 ms
jquery.qtip-1.0.0-rc3.js
129 ms
jquery.tipsy.js
110 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
108 ms
script.js
131 ms
body_grad.png
32 ms
submit_hover.png
31 ms
submit.png
32 ms
google.png
53 ms
yahoo.png
75 ms
foursquare.png
53 ms
citysearch.png
100 ms
ezlocal.png
78 ms
judysbook.png
105 ms
insiderpages.png
106 ms
thinklocal.png
139 ms
yellowassistance.png
163 ms
local.png
163 ms
kudzu.png
164 ms
botw.png
176 ms
superpages.png
176 ms
ask.png
174 ms
yellowpages.png
241 ms
dexknows.png
240 ms
yellowbot.png
240 ms
showmelocal.png
261 ms
city.png
242 ms
mojopages.png
243 ms
logo.png
261 ms
top_button_faq.png
263 ms
faq.png
287 ms
top_button_yellow.png
288 ms
email.png
288 ms
top_button_gray2.png
311 ms
serv.png
310 ms
top_button_gray3.png
311 ms
top_button_gray5.png
329 ms
top_button_gray.png
331 ms
top_icon_lock.png
329 ms
imagine.php
633 ms
round_button_green.png
363 ms
mMAJFumpyN8
94 ms
green_button_sign.png
338 ms
round_button_yellow.png
361 ms
yellow_button_sign.png
361 ms
banner_frame_screen.png
362 ms
table.jpg
433 ms
casestudy.png
363 ms
reviews.png
415 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
20 ms
www-embed-player.js
43 ms
left.png
453 ms
logo2.png
420 ms
round_button_green_over.png
449 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
37 ms
ad_status.js
38 ms
round_button_yellow_over.png
416 ms
top_button_gray_over.png
415 ms
top_button_yellow_over.png
435 ms
cf1_button_send_over.png
430 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
31 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
30 ms
put-test.png
451 ms
getmorereviews.png
449 ms
checklistings.png
473 ms
march-bonus.png
410 ms
close.png
418 ms
wrapper_top.png
430 ms
wrapper_middle.png
430 ms
input_left.png
438 ms
input_middle.png
445 ms
input_right.png
444 ms
wrapper_bottom.png
443 ms
ratingsking.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
ratingsking.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
ratingsking.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ratingsking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ratingsking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ratingsking.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ratings King. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: