Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    35% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

raven.net

IT Managed Support Services - Managed Technology Solutions

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

293 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

587 ms

raven.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Raven content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about raven.net

Raven provides IT managed support services to keep your business running smoothly. Our team of experts offer proactive service with guaranteed. Contact us

Visit raven.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Raven.net page load time and found that the first response time was 293 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

raven.net performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.417

23/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.6 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

raven.net

293 ms

gtm.js

97 ms

css

76 ms

font-awesome.min.css

68 ms

material-design-iconic-font.min.css

253 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Raven.net, 19% (18 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (573 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.shopify.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 88.0 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Raven.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 808.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 82.6 kB

  • Original 109.6 kB
  • After minification 95.8 kB
  • After compression 27.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.8 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 808.2 kB
  • After minification 805.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Raven images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 304.5 kB
  • After minification 304.5 kB
  • After compression 302.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 667 B

  • Original 64.1 kB
  • After minification 64.1 kB
  • After compression 63.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Raven.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (73%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raven. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

raven.net accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

raven.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

raven.net SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raven.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Raven.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Raven. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: