Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

ray.co

Ray Super Remote | World's best Universal Remote

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

14 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

ray.co screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ray content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ray.co

The Ray Super Remote is the perfect marriage of hardware and software. The ultimate TV search and discovery device, and an unrivaled universal remote control.

Visit ray.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Ray.co page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ray.co performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,770 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ray.co

14 ms

www.ray.co

66 ms

4084911947.js

153 ms

application-5126e473e695461537295ce47a89b0ef.css

26 ms

jquery.min.js

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Ray.co, 65% (46 requests) were made to Cdn.ray.co and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (759 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.ray.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 734.9 kB (18%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Ray.co main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 30.8 kB

  • Original 41.6 kB
  • After minification 41.5 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ray images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 392.7 kB

  • Original 607.5 kB
  • After minification 607.5 kB
  • After compression 214.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 392.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 303.0 kB

  • Original 481.9 kB
  • After minification 481.7 kB
  • After compression 178.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ray.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 303.0 kB or 63% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (25%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

43

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ray. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ray.co accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role] values are not valid

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ray.co best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ray.co SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ray.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ray.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ray. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: