2.6 sec in total
14 ms
1.2 sec
1.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Ray content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ray.co
The Ray Super Remote is the perfect marriage of hardware and software. The ultimate TV search and discovery device, and an unrivaled universal remote control.
Visit ray.coWe analyzed Ray.co page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
ray.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value1,770 ms
10/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.1 s
7/100
10%
14 ms
66 ms
153 ms
26 ms
69 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Ray.co, 65% (46 requests) were made to Cdn.ray.co and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (759 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.ray.co.
Page size can be reduced by 734.9 kB (18%)
4.1 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Ray.co main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ray images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 392.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 392.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 303.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ray.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 303.0 kB or 63% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (25%)
57
43
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ray. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ray.co
14 ms
www.ray.co
66 ms
4084911947.js
153 ms
application-5126e473e695461537295ce47a89b0ef.css
26 ms
jquery.min.js
69 ms
application-94b99fe13ac0556c1bd2d47fb77238cd.js
24 ms
event
94 ms
fbevents.js
351 ms
gtm.js
391 ms
Video_Still_480.jpg
435 ms
CES_Honoree_Large.png
433 ms
ray_stack.png
633 ms
Onboarding_01.jpg
436 ms
ray_outline.png
644 ms
ICON_Watch_Optimized.png
454 ms
ICON_Cord_Optimized.png
473 ms
ICON_Compass_Optimized.png
454 ms
Ray_Search_Optimized.png
638 ms
Ray_Discovery_Optimized.png
680 ms
Press_Wired_Optimized.png
609 ms
Press_Recode_Optimized.png
630 ms
Press_TechCrunch_Optimized.png
637 ms
Press_NYT_Optimized.png
652 ms
Press_Adweek_Optimized.png
642 ms
Ray_Press_Sideview_Optimized.png
704 ms
Devices_Grid_Optimized-83b118c27fc3520b07446c1e909a22b1.png
399 ms
Setup_BG.jpg
759 ms
Felt_BG_Seamless_OPTIMIZED.jpg
673 ms
Ray_Bottom_Sales_BG.jpg
711 ms
roboto-light-webfont.ttf
671 ms
roboto-thin-webfont.ttf
705 ms
roboto-regular-webfont.ttf
704 ms
fontawesome-webfont-97fe5482802948f24a0120ab1e8f7152.woff
306 ms
HelveticaNeue-Light.otf
717 ms
icomoon.ttf
572 ms
roboto-bold-webfont.ttf
700 ms
quant.js
394 ms
Gallery_01.jpg
417 ms
Cohenheads_Optimized.png
415 ms
Gallery_02.jpg
419 ms
Gallery_03.jpg
421 ms
Drewg_Optimized.png
421 ms
Ericries_Optimized.png
422 ms
Gallery_04.jpg
425 ms
Giordanobc_Optimized.png
423 ms
Gallery_05.jpg
422 ms
STB.svg
424 ms
TV.svg
428 ms
Reciever.svg
429 ms
widget_v2.132.js
132 ms
310 ms
326 ms
conversion_async.js
251 ms
analytics.js
250 ms
INTLT___.ttf
333 ms
roboto-medium-webfont.ttf
331 ms
roboto-slab-regular.ttf
360 ms
Roku.svg
332 ms
Soundbar.svg
332 ms
DVD_BluRay.svg
315 ms
pixel;r=829571591;a=p-D8nbeC3NCtqK_;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1159080818-1456881621401;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456881621401;tzo=-180;ref=;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ray.co%2F;ogl=
229 ms
Media_Player.svg
162 ms
AppleTV.svg
161 ms
Xbox.svg
159 ms
Nest_icon.svg
157 ms
87 ms
ec.js
39 ms
collect
59 ms
collect
103 ms
87 ms
ga-audiences
17 ms
ray.co accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role] values are not valid
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ray.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ray.co SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ray.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ray.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ray.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ray. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: