Tools & Wizards About Us
rbma.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

rbma.com

Reed Brennan Media Associates – Content Management and Production Solutions

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

353 ms

Resources Loaded

957 ms

Page Rendered

119 ms

rbma.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rbma.com now to see the best up-to-date Rbma content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rbma.com

Home - Reed Brennan Media Associates

Visit rbma.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rbma.com page load time and found that the first response time was 353 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rbma.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

28/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rbma.com

353 ms

style.css;wad7b16b368008546f

260 ms

header.css;wa726fe1926cb190e0

28 ms

menucss.css;wa3d4ec41b7bbf17e7

51 ms

main.css;wa6aff4939844aefed

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Rbma.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (353 ms) belongs to the original domain Rbma.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 197.6 kB (76%)

Content Size

261.6 kB

After Optimization

64.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rbma.com main page is 261.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 228.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 7.0 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 171.4 kB

  • Original 228.1 kB
  • After minification 56.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rbma needs image optimization as it can save up to 171.4 kB or 75% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 21.8 kB

  • Original 26.6 kB
  • After minification 21.6 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rbma.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (29%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rbma. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rbma.com

rbma.com

353 ms

style.css;wad7b16b368008546f

style.css;wad7b16b368008546f

260 ms

header.css;wa726fe1926cb190e0

header.css;wa726fe1926cb190e0

28 ms

menucss.css;wa3d4ec41b7bbf17e7

menucss.css;wa3d4ec41b7bbf17e7

51 ms

main.css;wa6aff4939844aefed

main.css;wa6aff4939844aefed

63 ms

buttons.css;wadbb0365a491d43d1

buttons.css;wadbb0365a491d43d1

57 ms

messages.css;wa325e41507e92ec6e

messages.css;wa325e41507e92ec6e

54 ms

modal.css;wac3f9290a421444fd

modal.css;wac3f9290a421444fd

52 ms

pagination.css;wa7f3f01db8c1428b3

pagination.css;wa7f3f01db8c1428b3

55 ms

all.js

all.js

70 ms

header_bg.gif

header_bg.gif

98 ms

rbma_logo_100.gif

rbma_logo_100.gif

99 ms

home.gif

home.gif

98 ms

reprints3_final.gif

reprints3_final.gif

99 ms

pagination.png

pagination.png

159 ms

editing.png

editing.png

148 ms

color_services.png

color_services.png

147 ms

distribution.png

distribution.png

174 ms

fulfillment.png

fulfillment.png

109 ms

616EA2.gif

616EA2.gif

106 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

125 ms

131 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

40 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

48 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

14 ms

Accessibility Review

rbma.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rbma.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rbma.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rbma.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rbma.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rbma.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rbma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: