2.7 sec in total
459 ms
1.8 sec
388 ms
Welcome to rdresurfacing.com homepage info - get ready to check R D Resurfacing best content right away, or after learning these important things about rdresurfacing.com
Visit rdresurfacing.comWe analyzed Rdresurfacing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 459 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
rdresurfacing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value16.8 s
0/100
25%
Value5.6 s
53/100
10%
Value1,110 ms
23/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
459 ms
52 ms
48 ms
51 ms
79 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Rdresurfacing.com, 19% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (603 ms) relates to the external source Gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 163.7 kB (5%)
3.2 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Rdresurfacing.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 93.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. R D Resurfacing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rdresurfacing.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (74%)
58
15
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of R D Resurfacing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.rdresurfacing.com
459 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
52 ms
style.min.css
48 ms
theme.min.css
51 ms
style.css
79 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
52 ms
animations.min.css
76 ms
frontend.min.css
108 ms
frontend.css
98 ms
formreset.min.css
77 ms
formsmain.min.css
123 ms
readyclass.min.css
120 ms
browsers.min.css
112 ms
frontend.min.css
112 ms
global.css
127 ms
post-12.css
126 ms
post-10.css
127 ms
post-13.css
128 ms
post-52.css
132 ms
css
32 ms
fontawesome.min.css
128 ms
solid.min.css
142 ms
brands.min.css
143 ms
jquery.js
165 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
151 ms
jquery.json.min.js
151 ms
gravityforms.min.js
150 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
164 ms
priority-menu.js
143 ms
touch-keyboard-navigation.js
143 ms
wp-embed.min.js
143 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
144 ms
frontend.js
146 ms
api.js
61 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
148 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
161 ms
frontend.min.js
161 ms
position.min.js
154 ms
dialog.min.js
154 ms
waypoints.min.js
209 ms
swiper.min.js
209 ms
share-link.min.js
210 ms
frontend.min.js
208 ms
bg.png
412 ms
main_logo-copy-1.png
124 ms
redribbon-30years-1.png
464 ms
100_0524.jpg
412 ms
IMG_1713.jpg
538 ms
100_0753.jpg
414 ms
100_0147.jpg
411 ms
100_0776.jpg
485 ms
100_0677.jpg
538 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
116 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
387 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
405 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
418 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
432 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
432 ms
recaptcha__en.js
603 ms
8AD3jaY2BkYGDgAWIxIGZiYARCESBmAfMYAAR6AEMAAAABAAAAANXtRbgAAAAA2AhRFAAAAADYCNuG
5 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
321 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
320 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
320 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
324 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
322 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
324 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
320 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
323 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
323 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
382 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
416 ms
frontend-msie.min.css
291 ms
Slideme1.jpg
219 ms
Slideme3.jpg
179 ms
Slideme2.jpg
180 ms
S1.jpg
211 ms
eicons.woff
145 ms
print.css
49 ms
rdresurfacing.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rdresurfacing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rdresurfacing.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rdresurfacing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rdresurfacing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rdresurfacing.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of R D Resurfacing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: