5.6 sec in total
1.3 sec
3.9 sec
451 ms
Welcome to re-match.dk homepage info - get ready to check Re Match best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about re-match.dk
Visit re-match.dkWe analyzed Re-match.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
re-match.dk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.2 s
0/100
10%
Value17.9 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value600 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.412
24/100
15%
Value15.3 s
7/100
10%
1268 ms
28 ms
224 ms
39 ms
327 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Re-match.dk, 11% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Re-match.dk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (60%)
2.8 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Re-match.dk main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Re Match images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 504.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 504.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Re-match.dk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (59%)
56
23
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Re Match. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
re-match.dk
1268 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
1454.js
224 ms
fbevents.js
39 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
327 ms
styles.css
241 ms
checkbox.min.css
230 ms
bootstrap.min.css
663 ms
fontello.css
574 ms
css
22 ms
css
33 ms
css
55 ms
css
55 ms
prettyPhoto.css
306 ms
animate.css
673 ms
video-js.css
476 ms
theme-style.css
749 ms
responsive.css
432 ms
style.css
542 ms
collect
13 ms
102 ms
form.min.css
520 ms
jquery.js
904 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
605 ms
js
30 ms
custom-video.js
656 ms
header-video.js
704 ms
js_composer.min.css
1605 ms
jquery.form.min.js
618 ms
scripts.js
658 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
61 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
47 ms
bootstrap.min.js
680 ms
jquery.plugin.js
1161 ms
video.js
949 ms
custom.js
904 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
866 ms
6709.jpg
237 ms
TS1-062931.jpg
337 ms
6871_close-up.jpg
880 ms
6797_close-up.jpg
682 ms
TS1-062896.jpg
1762 ms
11156769_570504876386366_2127101574_n.jpg
447 ms
11158094_569570406479813_437471597_n.jpg
577 ms
collection_v004.jpg
847 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
37 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTZS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
37 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
68 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
36 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hpS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
36 ms
fontello.svg
1610 ms
fontello.woff
842 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1612 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1607 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nk7nEl83IKQRaQwpv_tz1Eg.ttf
16 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
16 ms
image001.jpeg
1530 ms
PEN_twitter_logo.png
1528 ms
dr_logo_2013.jpg
1526 ms
aftenposten.jpg
1525 ms
1446044130_kwrite.png
1526 ms
1446044021_133.png
1520 ms
iframe_api
175 ms
ajax-loader.gif
121 ms
top.png
121 ms
bottom.png
120 ms
re-match.dk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
re-match.dk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
re-match.dk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Re-match.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Re-match.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
re-match.dk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Re Match. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: