4.7 sec in total
239 ms
4 sec
408 ms
Click here to check amazing Read Burnley content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about readburnley.com
Burnley news, opinions, slideshows, galleries, quizzes, polls and more
Visit readburnley.comWe analyzed Readburnley.com page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
readburnley.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value1,170 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.261
47/100
15%
Value12.4 s
14/100
10%
239 ms
448 ms
117 ms
329 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Readburnley.com, 28% (13 requests) were made to Cdn.readeverything.co and 7% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Game.snack-clients.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 110.5 kB (24%)
451.8 kB
341.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Readburnley.com main page is 451.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 244.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.2 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Read Burnley images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 19.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readburnley.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (59%)
41
17
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Read Burnley. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
readburnley.com
239 ms
readburnley.com
448 ms
bootstrap.min.css
117 ms
base.e5d5b729cb7edd29f0354f4139a32d87.css
329 ms
all.css
154 ms
snack-cmp_v2.min.js
143 ms
home-widgets.e5d5b729cb7edd29f0354f4139a32d87.css
335 ms
read-more.e5d5b729cb7edd29f0354f4139a32d87.css
339 ms
style.min.css
480 ms
rh.min.js
125 ms
jquery-3.4.1.min.js
493 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
228 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
342 ms
lozad.min.js
22 ms
common-min.e5d5b729cb7edd29f0354f4139a32d87.js
492 ms
1169
142 ms
gameticker.min.js
3311 ms
read-more-min.e5d5b729cb7edd29f0354f4139a32d87.js
491 ms
jquery.min.js
554 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
492 ms
next-fixture.js
554 ms
table.js
554 ms
results.js
554 ms
top-scorers.js
567 ms
css
34 ms
choice.js
448 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
29 ms
js
47 ms
colour.png
69 ms
white.png
66 ms
white.png
66 ms
white.png
110 ms
white.png
66 ms
white.png
79 ms
white.png
67 ms
white.png
66 ms
white.png
109 ms
white.png
68 ms
white.png
68 ms
white.png
71 ms
white.png
69 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
108 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
119 ms
cmp2-polyfilled.js
4 ms
readburnley.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
readburnley.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
readburnley.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readburnley.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Readburnley.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
readburnley.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Read Burnley. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: