1.2 sec in total
308 ms
707 ms
200 ms
Welcome to reader2.com homepage info - get ready to check Reader 2 best content right away, or after learning these important things about reader2.com
Visit reader2.comWe analyzed Reader2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 308 ms and then it took 907 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Reader2.com rating and web reputation
reader2.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value5.1 s
24/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value4.4 s
83/100
10%
308 ms
12 ms
22 ms
257 ms
259 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Reader2.com, 27% (8 requests) were made to Shared.reader2.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (308 ms) belongs to the original domain Reader2.com.
Page size can be reduced by 64.9 kB (73%)
89.1 kB
24.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Reader2.com main page is 89.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 61.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reader 2 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 44.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 44.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reader2.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (78%)
27
6
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reader 2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
reader2.com
308 ms
stylesheet.css
12 ms
show_ads.js
22 ms
prototype.js
257 ms
functions.js
259 ms
contextmenu.js
262 ms
locale.php
67 ms
suggester.js
257 ms
main.js
66 ms
floating.js
263 ms
functionaddevent.js
262 ms
tooltiplib.js
261 ms
lightbox.js
263 ms
urchin.js
64 ms
pagebg.gif
58 ms
feed.gif
58 ms
ca-pub-3769445657017918.js
147 ms
zrt_lookup.html
39 ms
show_ads_impl.js
41 ms
menubg.gif
19 ms
logo2.gif
19 ms
libgb.gif
26 ms
libgt.gif
26 ms
ads
28 ms
osd.js
5 ms
headergrad.gif
62 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
lbox_overlay.png
4 ms
lbox_loading.gif
5 ms
lbox_close.gif
5 ms
reader2.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
reader2.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
reader2.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ID
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reader2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Reader2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reader2.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reader 2. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: