1.3 sec in total
180 ms
906 ms
164 ms
Welcome to readingcare.com homepage info - get ready to check Reading Care best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about readingcare.com
Looking for reading comprehension worksheets for middle & high school to improve your reading skills? Visit Reading care to register now for reading comprehension worksheets!
Visit readingcare.comWe analyzed Readingcare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
readingcare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
8/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value440 ms
64/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value5.9 s
65/100
10%
180 ms
138 ms
166 ms
59 ms
145 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Readingcare.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (187 ms) belongs to the original domain Readingcare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 587.9 kB (22%)
2.7 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Readingcare.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.3 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reading Care images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 263.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 263.0 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 159.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readingcare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 159.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (55%)
56
25
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reading Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
readingcare.com
180 ms
www.readingcare.com
138 ms
www.readingcare.com
166 ms
style.css
59 ms
general.css
145 ms
modernizr-2.0.6.min.js
99 ms
jquery-1.9.0.min.js
123 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
76 ms
default.css
86 ms
light.css
87 ms
dark.css
101 ms
bar.css
115 ms
nivo-slider.css
116 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
124 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
174 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
172 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
172 ms
ui.totop.css
172 ms
easing.js
172 ms
jquery.ui.totop.js
176 ms
script.js
181 ms
WebResource.axd
180 ms
ScriptResource.axd
187 ms
ScriptResource.axd
187 ms
analytics.js
75 ms
Bottom_texture.jpg
73 ms
bl1.gif
72 ms
member.png
72 ms
top_logo.png
72 ms
slider_6.png
88 ms
slider_2.png
95 ms
slider_1.png
166 ms
slider_5.png
130 ms
newsat_main_title.jpg
127 ms
jr_main_title.jpg
132 ms
sat_main_title.jpg
111 ms
sister_writingcare.jpg
118 ms
vocabulary-main.jpg
137 ms
page_gl.png
87 ms
top-links.png
88 ms
header.jpg
101 ms
nav.png
101 ms
drop-submenu.png
102 ms
loading.gif
113 ms
sheet_b.png
112 ms
sheet_t.png
129 ms
sheet.png
124 ms
content-row-b.png
129 ms
block-div-h.png
123 ms
footer_b.png
139 ms
footer-ov.png
136 ms
footer.png
149 ms
f_inset_dotted.png
151 ms
menuseparator.png
157 ms
ui.totop.png
160 ms
selected-right-sub.png
159 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
44 ms
arrows.png
31 ms
bullets.png
30 ms
readingcare.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
readingcare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
readingcare.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readingcare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Readingcare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
readingcare.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reading Care. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: