Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

rebatetrack.com

Rebate Track Center

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

525 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

135 ms

rebatetrack.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rebatetrack.com homepage info - get ready to check Rebate Track best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about rebatetrack.com

Visit rebatetrack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rebatetrack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 525 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rebatetrack.com performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

89/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rebatetrack.com

525 ms

track.html

335 ms

styles.css

316 ms

global.css

555 ms

jscripts.js

839 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rebatetrack.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (839 ms) belongs to the original domain Rebatetrack.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 41.6 kB (73%)

Content Size

57.1 kB

After Optimization

15.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Rebatetrack.com main page is 57.1 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 17.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 17.6 kB
  • After minification 11.6 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 11.0 kB
  • After minification 9.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rebate Track images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 17.9 kB
  • After minification 13.2 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 91% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 10.6 kB
  • After minification 9.1 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rebatetrack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rebate Track. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rebatetrack.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

rebatetrack.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

rebatetrack.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rebatetrack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rebatetrack.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rebate Track. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: