4.5 sec in total
524 ms
3.6 sec
451 ms
Click here to check amazing Receptional content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about receptional.com
Delight, engage and convert customers with our creative and effective digital campaigns. Learn more about our SEO, PPC, digital PR and content services.
Visit receptional.comWe analyzed Receptional.com page load time and found that the first response time was 524 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
receptional.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value17.3 s
0/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value1,430 ms
15/100
30%
Value1.003
2/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
524 ms
169 ms
191 ms
23 ms
128 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Receptional.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (740 ms) belongs to the original domain Receptional.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (62%)
1.8 MB
678.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Receptional.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 825.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Receptional needs image optimization as it can save up to 51.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 573.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 573.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 423.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Receptional.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 423.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (59%)
79
32
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Receptional. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.receptional.com
524 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
169 ms
layerslider.css
191 ms
css
23 ms
styles.css
128 ms
cab-style.css
129 ms
settings.css
253 ms
arconix-flexslider.css
194 ms
css
34 ms
css
43 ms
style.css
317 ms
retina.css
191 ms
tipsy.css
220 ms
bootstrap.css
443 ms
font-awesome.css
345 ms
magnific-popup.css
264 ms
responsive.css
342 ms
greensock.js
379 ms
jquery.js
631 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
380 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
529 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
395 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
574 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
573 ms
plugins.js
740 ms
style.css
392 ms
jquery.form.min.js
528 ms
scripts.js
480 ms
custom.js
544 ms
comment-reply.min.js
527 ms
wp-embed.min.js
543 ms
custom-pagination.js
590 ms
affix.js
611 ms
init.js
587 ms
style.css
598 ms
font-awesome.min.css
39 ms
36dfe3f671f241c9c5e8a2b0c693c36c
65 ms
ReceptionalV3-m.png
274 ms
search.png
270 ms
home_bg.jpg
278 ms
bg-white.png
268 ms
icon-ppc.png
267 ms
icon-content.png
61 ms
icon-link.png
268 ms
icon-target.png
270 ms
icon-analytics.png
268 ms
icon-code.png
270 ms
ladbrokes-80x80.jpg
272 ms
nicky-s-80x80.jpg
273 ms
Janine-Chamberlain-picture.jpeg
276 ms
icon-left.png
272 ms
icon-right.png
273 ms
bg-light.png
274 ms
nqa-logo1.png
404 ms
Verbaudet-logo-240x1201.png
276 ms
brilliant-ways-we-built-links-300x200.jpg
339 ms
better-ad-targeting-with-google-customer-match-300x200.jpg
337 ms
6-steps-to-become-a-conversion-scientist-300x200.jpg
356 ms
seo-1-300x200.jpg
358 ms
plane.png
410 ms
facebook.png
355 ms
twitter.png
401 ms
google_plus.png
409 ms
bg-dark.png
402 ms
widgets.js
9 ms
gtm.js
194 ms
mainsubmenu.png
148 ms
din-regular-webfont.woff
181 ms
din-bold-webfont.woff
172 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
196 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
59 ms
din-light-webfont.woff
208 ms
din16-itl-webfont.woff
257 ms
timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js
58 ms
analytics.js
48 ms
syndication
77 ms
694795037327122432
186 ms
linkid.js
24 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
59 ms
collect
17 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
2 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
4 ms
4fad5dae259280f18c2794b61fbf0b18_normal.jpeg
54 ms
nII6DRfo_normal.jpeg
52 ms
jot
22 ms
view
670 ms
receptional.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
receptional.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
receptional.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Receptional.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Receptional.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
receptional.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Receptional. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: