6.4 sec in total
147 ms
2.9 sec
3.4 sec
Visit redhanger.com now to see the best up-to-date Red Hanger content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about redhanger.com
We’re Utah’s best dry cleaner and professional launderer. More Utahan's choose Red Hanger every year than any other cleaner.
Visit redhanger.comWe analyzed Redhanger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
redhanger.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value15.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.0 s
1/100
10%
Value22,940 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value30.3 s
0/100
10%
147 ms
337 ms
140 ms
62 ms
266 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Redhanger.com, 12% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Redhanger.com.
Page size can be reduced by 356.8 kB (11%)
3.3 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Redhanger.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 344.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 344.9 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Red Hanger images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 886 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Redhanger.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (47%)
75
40
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Red Hanger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
redhanger.com
147 ms
redhanger.com
337 ms
gtm.js
140 ms
bootstrap.min.css
62 ms
google-review.css
266 ms
style.min.css
259 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.min.css
255 ms
5236-layout.css
250 ms
public-main.css
255 ms
style.css
138 ms
all.css
209 ms
bootstrap.min.css
181 ms
skin-628df7d57d5c0.css
240 ms
css
132 ms
v4-shims.css
246 ms
wpac-time.js
298 ms
jquery.min.js
372 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
306 ms
public-main.js
307 ms
js
133 ms
css
134 ms
style.css
305 ms
swiper.min.css
298 ms
jquery.magnificpopup.min.js
344 ms
5236-layout.js
358 ms
frontend.min.js
358 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
369 ms
bootstrap.min.js
359 ms
theme.min.js
400 ms
blazy.min.js
411 ms
rplg.js
407 ms
swiper.min.js
667 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
301 ms
easy-table.css
305 ms
js
235 ms
fbevents.js
235 ms
w.js
415 ms
analytics.js
417 ms
redHanger_logo.png
292 ms
Feature-Image-1.png
348 ms
1-300x300.png
340 ms
2-300x300.png
341 ms
3-300x300.png
291 ms
4-300x300.png
292 ms
5-300x300.png
345 ms
6-300x300.png
346 ms
7-300x300.png
343 ms
8-300x300.png
346 ms
9-300x300.png
451 ms
10-300x300.png
1299 ms
11-300x300.png
1298 ms
12-300x300.png
451 ms
13-300x300.png
1304 ms
14-300x300.png
1298 ms
15-300x300.png
1303 ms
16-300x300.png
1302 ms
17.png
1662 ms
22-1024x1024.png
1328 ms
logo_onblack-300x165.png
1307 ms
FRSTeam.png
1328 ms
18-300x300.png
1174 ms
19-300x300.png
1175 ms
20-300x300.png
1179 ms
21.png
1421 ms
08-copy1.jpg
1438 ms
151.jpg
1437 ms
image26-1024x679.jpg
1435 ms
161-1024x768.jpg
1437 ms
0511-1024x701.jpg
1439 ms
13-Foothill1.jpg
1507 ms
173599839752458
126 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
973 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
978 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
977 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
1006 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
979 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
970 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1258 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1395 ms
k3kUo8kEI-tA1RRcTZGmTlHGCaI.ttf
971 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
998 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf
1001 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf
1001 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
1001 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf
1001 ms
collect
923 ms
collect
1194 ms
1f642.svg
1082 ms
collect
526 ms
collect
251 ms
settings.luckyorange.net
165 ms
redhanger.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
redhanger.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
redhanger.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Redhanger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Redhanger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
redhanger.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Red Hanger. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: