5.8 sec in total
1 sec
4.5 sec
241 ms
Welcome to registry.pw homepage info - get ready to check Registry best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about registry.pw
.PW is the online destination for Professionals and Businesses. The Professional Web is globally accessible, dedicated namespace for professionals and businesses to set up an online presence.
Visit registry.pwWe analyzed Registry.pw page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
registry.pw performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
1007 ms
218 ms
181 ms
110 ms
73 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Registry.pw, 5% (5 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Registry.pw.
Page size can be reduced by 623.0 kB (35%)
1.8 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Registry.pw main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 978.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Registry needs image optimization as it can save up to 132.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 332.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 332.7 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Registry.pw needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 114.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (59%)
87
36
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Registry. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
registry.pw
1007 ms
style.css
218 ms
style.css
181 ms
global.css
110 ms
styles.css
73 ms
styles.css
182 ms
jquery.qtip.min.css
181 ms
default.css
188 ms
pagenavi-css.css
153 ms
jquery.js
411 ms
iphorm.js
192 ms
swfupload-all.js
223 ms
jquery-1.6.2.min.js
368 ms
cufon-yui.js
229 ms
CorisandeRegular_400.font.js
220 ms
slides.min.jquery.js
221 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
223 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
259 ms
jquery.cookie.js
225 ms
style.css
232 ms
jquery.vticker-min.js
258 ms
jquery.tweet.js
260 ms
jquery.tweet.css
267 ms
element.js
49 ms
jquery.form.min.js
259 ms
scripts.js
260 ms
jquery.iphorm.js
298 ms
jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js
268 ms
jquery.qtip.min.js
330 ms
jquery.uniform.js
331 ms
jquery.infieldlabel.min.js
304 ms
conversion.js
19 ms
ga.js
36 ms
body_bg.png
50 ms
domainchecker
41 ms
main_bg.png
38 ms
logo.png
39 ms
sprite.png
40 ms
sub-topp.png
40 ms
sub-btmp.png
59 ms
slider_bg.png
207 ms
sl_patrn.png
323 ms
slid1bg.png
217 ms
slider1_image.png
207 ms
slider1_btn.png
88 ms
slider2_image.png
217 ms
slider3_btn.png
147 ms
arrow-prev.png
206 ms
arrow-next.png
217 ms
slider_shadow.png
217 ms
box1_ic.png
216 ms
dig_bg.png
250 ms
dot_bdr.png
250 ms
more_btn.png
250 ms
box2_ic.png
249 ms
box3_ic.png
248 ms
tw_ic.png
286 ms
fb_ic.png
282 ms
in_ic.png
281 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
corisanderegular.woff
254 ms
footer_rpt.png
243 ms
FooterV1.jpg
311 ms
translateelement.css
69 ms
main.js
97 ms
101 ms
element_main.js
69 ms
__utm.gif
57 ms
domainchecker
163 ms
search.json
78 ms
slid1bg.png
228 ms
loader.gif
120 ms
menu_hover.png
120 ms
loading.gif
152 ms
pagination.png
152 ms
translate_24dp.png
26 ms
l
48 ms
cleardot.gif
40 ms
68 ms
te_ctrl3.gif
10 ms
42 ms
main.css
37 ms
jquery-1.2.6.min.js
2435 ms
Text.png
37 ms
Search.png
121 ms
load.gif
86 ms
roundtrip.js
7 ms
file-upload-tick.png
50 ms
captcha-refresh-icon.png
48 ms
default-loading.gif
48 ms
error.png
47 ms
success.png
47 ms
GYABS5IQ4NFTTALEAWNXSI.js
180 ms
registry.pw accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
registry.pw best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
registry.pw SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Registry.pw can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Registry.pw main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
registry.pw
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Registry. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: