Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

remington.com

Remington

Page Load Speed

78.5 sec in total

First Response

160 ms

Resources Loaded

39.3 sec

Page Rendered

39 sec

remington.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Remington content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about remington.com

Remington

Visit remington.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Remington.com page load time and found that the first response time was 160 ms and then it took 78.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

remington.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value540 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.734

6/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

remington.com

160 ms

www.remington.com

1085 ms

163348C56B9035483.css

578 ms

flickity.css

2275 ms

css__ZfL_yFbIUYTVjpHjaFHV5WXs_2ySg72aTMtBNB6SCfc__Oaq5-BdPmil_SZS8t31sgVxy0YysS4ucGaWoWr2mA_c__Ma_hrgJ9sVEDCPHgNLYWmtvG-vgpETgXYVoEvQs-xMg.css

1497 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Remington.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (15.6 sec) relates to the external source Players.brightcove.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (20%)

Content Size

14.2 MB

After Optimization

11.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Remington.com main page is 14.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 10.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 160.6 kB

  • Original 203.0 kB
  • After minification 184.3 kB
  • After compression 42.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 382.2 kB

  • Original 10.9 MB
  • After minification 10.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Remington images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB
  • After compression 637.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 696.2 kB

  • Original 869.0 kB
  • After minification 847.9 kB
  • After compression 172.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remington.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 696.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (26%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

66

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remington. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

remington.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

remington.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

remington.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remington.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Remington.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Remington. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: