Access remont-61.com. Ремонт квартир в Ростове-на-Дону «под ключ» по себестоимости

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,470 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

remont-61.com

1248 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

319 ms

owl.carousel.css

323 ms

jquery.formstyler.css

327 ms

styles.css

1526 ms

Our browser made a total of 146 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Remont-61.com, 14% (20 requests) were made to Api-maps.yandex.ru and 4% (6 requests) were made to Vec04.maps.yandex.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Remont-61.com.

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Remont-61.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 264.5 kB

Original 308.4 kB
After minification 301.0 kB
After compression 44.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 264.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 729.4 kB

Original 3.1 MB
After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Remont 61 needs image optimization as it can save up to 729.4 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 432.3 kB

Original 581.6 kB
After minification 438.7 kB
After compression 149.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 432.3 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-97%

Potential reduce by 480.2 kB

Original 494.7 kB
After minification 83.3 kB
After compression 14.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Remont-61.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 480.2 kB or 97% of the original size.

Requests Now

129

After Optimization

The browser has sent 129 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Remont 61. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

RU
Language Claimed

RU
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Remont-61.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Remont-61.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

remont-61.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Remont 61. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Ремонт квартир в Ростове-на-Дону «под ключ» по себестоимости | Ремонт-61

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

remont-61.com

jquery.fancybox.css

owl.carousel.css

jquery.formstyler.css

styles.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

remont-61.com

jquery.fancybox.css

owl.carousel.css

jquery.formstyler.css

styles.css

logo-header.png

stadart%20remnt.png

evro5.png

econom%20kvart.png

caret-down-black.png

choose-active.png

icon-benefits-1.png

icon-benefits-2.png

icon-benefits-3.png

icon-benefits-4.png

348.jpg

loop.png

268.jpg

263.jpg

279.jpg

305.jpg

6_remont_gostinoj_85ae75_3229.jpg

1_remont_kuhni_99ef04_3159.jpg

share.js

jquery.js

yii.js

yii.validation.js

yii.activeForm.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

owl.carousel.min.js

jquery.formstyler.min.js

TweenLite.min.js

CSSPlugin.min.js

ScrollMagic.min.js

animation.gsap.min.js

script.js

scrollmagic.js

bloodhound.min.js

typeahead.jquery.min.js

typeahead.css

fixed-form-background.png

search-button.png

light-blue-form-background.png