Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

res.ridgefield.org

Home - Ridgebury Elementary School (Ridgefield Public Schools)

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

175 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

352 ms

res.ridgefield.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to res.ridgefield.org homepage info - get ready to check Res Ridgefield best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about res.ridgefield.org

Welcome to the Ridgebury Elementary School website. We like to think of ourselves as “the kindness school,” where learning and kindness go in hand in our pre-kindergarten through fifth grade classroom...

Visit res.ridgefield.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Res.ridgefield.org page load time and found that the first response time was 175 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

res.ridgefield.org performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,810 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.128

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

res.ridgefield.org

175 ms

101 ms

293 ms

standard-css-leatherpanel-ltr-ltr.css

33 ms

overlay.css

114 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Res.ridgefield.org, 18% (10 requests) were made to Ssl.gstatic.com and 16% (9 requests) were made to Docs.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Docs.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (43%)

Content Size

5.0 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Res.ridgefield.org main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 32.9 kB

  • Original 42.6 kB
  • After minification 42.5 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Res Ridgefield images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 2.4 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB
  • After compression 844.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 577.8 kB

  • Original 684.7 kB
  • After minification 682.1 kB
  • After compression 106.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Res.ridgefield.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 577.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (56%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Res Ridgefield. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

res.ridgefield.org accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

res.ridgefield.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

res.ridgefield.org SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Res.ridgefield.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Res.ridgefield.org main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Res Ridgefield. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: