8.5 sec in total
1.3 sec
6.9 sec
268 ms
Click here to check amazing Research Review content for New Zealand. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about researchreview.co.nz
Research Review publications bring the best of global medical journals to your inbox every issue with commentary from New Zealand experts. Over 40 areas including Cardiology, Diabetes, Oncology, GP an...
Visit researchreview.co.nzWe analyzed Researchreview.co.nz page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
researchreview.co.nz performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
1/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value5,490 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.171
70/100
15%
Value13.3 s
12/100
10%
1316 ms
114 ms
601 ms
1400 ms
611 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Researchreview.co.nz, 2% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Researchreview.co.nz.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (30%)
6.2 MB
4.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Researchreview.co.nz main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Research Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 367.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 367.6 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 144.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Researchreview.co.nz needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 144.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (43%)
86
49
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Research Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
Home.aspx
1316 ms
sidebarv2.js
114 ms
modernizr.min.js
601 ms
jquery.min.js
1400 ms
liveFilter.js
611 ms
nav.js
617 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1234 ms
stickit.js
788 ms
cookie.js
798 ms
accessibility.js
802 ms
hotkeys.js
823 ms
magnificpopup.js
993 ms
page.js
998 ms
magnificpopup.js
1001 ms
hotkeys.js
1028 ms
GetResource.ashx
1225 ms
GetResource.ashx
1222 ms
GetResource.ashx
1641 ms
GetResource.ashx
1444 ms
GetResource.ashx
1425 ms
GetResource.ashx
1427 ms
GetResource.ashx
1447 ms
font-awesome.min.css
21 ms
slideshow.js
1595 ms
GetResource.ashx
1625 ms
WebResource.axd
1629 ms
GetResource.ashx
1859 ms
GetResource.ashx
1668 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1796 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1825 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1829 ms
PortalTemplate.aspx
1846 ms
font-awesome.css
20 ms
signup-popup.js
1533 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1620 ms
main.js
1643 ms
js
1651 ms
GetResource.ashx
1666 ms
analytics.js
45 ms
ga.js
45 ms
RR-NZ-logo_rgb.png.aspx
482 ms
education-series.png.aspx
875 ms
desc-logo.png
1168 ms
free-to-subscribe.png.aspx
997 ms
australian-expert-commentary.png.aspx
816 ms
educational-series.png.aspx
1027 ms
opinion_leaders.png.aspx
862 ms
cpd-points-attached.png.aspx
1061 ms
world-leading-expert.png.aspx
1116 ms
regular-updates.png.aspx
1144 ms
conference-reviews.png.aspx
1238 ms
product-reviews.png.aspx
1280 ms
speaker-events.png.aspx
1322 ms
icon-download.png
1325 ms
icon-search.png
1350 ms
doc.png.aspx
1386 ms
SOU0033-AP-Referral-170x315-static.jpg.aspx
1448 ms
NZPHM-RR-ad.jpg.aspx
1493 ms
RR-NZ-subscriber-banner-2017.jpg.aspx
1532 ms
NZMA-Web-Banner-for-RR_FINAL-new.jpg.aspx
1546 ms
guthealth_square1.jpg.aspx
1564 ms
trademe_1.gif.aspx
1593 ms
trademe_2.gif.aspx
1654 ms
trademe_3.gif.aspx
1699 ms
trademe_4.gif.aspx
1737 ms
trademe_5.gif.aspx
1746 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
collect
11 ms
nzma.png
1630 ms
nurses-college-logo.png
1624 ms
Pharmacy-Guild-of-New-Zealand.png.aspx
1778 ms
logo8australasia.jpg.aspx
1763 ms
acc-logo-tagline.png.aspx
1694 ms
fIaW7hYy.png.aspx
1653 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
30 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
6 ms
icomoon.woff
1615 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1621 ms
gfu_unit_logo.png.aspx
1781 ms
RCAA-logo.jpg.aspx
1688 ms
Medical-Technology-Ass-NZ-logo_1.JPG.aspx
1688 ms
TwitterColor.png
1423 ms
FacebookColor.png
1378 ms
footer-logo.png
1361 ms
rr_line-points_lhs.png
1371 ms
rr_line-points_rhs2.png
1343 ms
main-header-snake.png
1308 ms
main-header-new.png
1321 ms
icon-signup.png
1299 ms
banner-desc.png
1283 ms
striped-pattern.png
1329 ms
researchreview.co.nz accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
researchreview.co.nz best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
researchreview.co.nz SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Researchreview.co.nz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Researchreview.co.nz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
researchreview.co.nz
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Research Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: