Tools & Wizards About Us
responseim.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

responseim.com

Digital Marketing Agency | Portland, OR | Response Interactive

Page Load Speed

973 ms in total

First Response

125 ms

Resources Loaded

659 ms

Page Rendered

189 ms

responseim.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Response Im content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about responseim.com

Response Interactive is a digital marketing agency in Portland, OR. We specialize in SEO, Website Design and Development and more. Get a free website audit.

Visit responseim.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Responseim.com page load time and found that the first response time was 125 ms and then it took 848 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

responseim.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.266

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

responseim.com

125 ms

www.responseim.com

156 ms

style.css

40 ms

26143779

213 ms

in.js

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Responseim.com, 32% (12 requests) were made to Public.slidesharecdn.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (213 ms) relates to the external source Slideshare.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 93.5 kB (29%)

Content Size

319.2 kB

After Optimization

225.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Responseim.com main page is 319.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 161.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 13.1 kB
  • After minification 11.5 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.6 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 161.1 kB
  • After minification 159.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Response Im images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 34.4 kB
  • After minification 34.4 kB
  • After compression 32.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 81.9 kB

  • Original 110.6 kB
  • After minification 109.9 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Responseim.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 81.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (51%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Response Im. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

responseim.com

responseim.com

125 ms

www.responseim.com

www.responseim.com

156 ms

style.css

style.css

40 ms

26143779

26143779

213 ms

in.js

in.js

26 ms

home_icon.gif

home_icon.gif

113 ms

sitemap_icon.gif

sitemap_icon.gif

114 ms

responseim_logo.jpg

responseim_logo.jpg

115 ms

SEA_NW.png

SEA_NW.png

116 ms

seacert.gif

seacert.gif

113 ms

sempdx-logosm.jpg

sempdx-logosm.jpg

115 ms

secureAnonymousFramework

secureAnonymousFramework

99 ms

ga.js

ga.js

28 ms

topbg_img.jpg

topbg_img.jpg

112 ms

caption.gif

caption.gif

77 ms

btm_img.jpg

btm_img.jpg

111 ms

counter.js

counter.js

19 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

25 ms

t.php

t.php

52 ms

sprite_connect_v14.png

sprite_connect_v14.png

36 ms

combined_jquery.js

combined_jquery.js

11 ms

global.js

global.js

34 ms

combined_li_tracking.js

combined_li_tracking.js

33 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

33 ms

combined_presentation.css

combined_presentation.css

31 ms

combined_player_presentation.js

combined_player_presentation.js

32 ms

combined_old_embed.js

combined_old_embed.js

57 ms

combined_base.js

combined_base.js

88 ms

beacon.js

beacon.js

81 ms

response-interactive-services-and-results-1-638.jpg

response-interactive-services-and-results-1-638.jpg

108 ms

26143779

26143779

62 ms

1x1.gif

1x1.gif

60 ms

logo_embed_20x20_v1.png

logo_embed_20x20_v1.png

60 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

33 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

17 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

17 ms

icons.svg

icons.svg

6 ms

status

status

17 ms

Accessibility Review

responseim.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

responseim.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

responseim.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Responseim.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Responseim.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

responseim.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Response Im. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: