34.5 sec in total
502 ms
12.4 sec
21.5 sec
Visit result.com now to see the best up-to-date Result content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about result.com
Result
Visit result.comWe analyzed Result.com page load time and found that the first response time was 502 ms and then it took 34 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
result.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value3.1 s
76/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
502 ms
688 ms
804 ms
644 ms
567 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Result.com, 81% (46 requests) were made to Static.tildacdn.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) relates to the external source Script.hotjar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (41%)
3.0 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Result.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 536.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Result needs image optimization as it can save up to 536.3 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 462.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 462.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 165.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Result.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 165.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (71%)
55
16
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Result. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
result.com
502 ms
tilda-grid-3.0.min.css
688 ms
tilda-blocks-2.12.css
804 ms
tilda-slides-1.0.min.css
644 ms
css
567 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
642 ms
tilda-scripts-2.8.min.js
641 ms
tilda-blocks-2.7.js
642 ms
hammer.min.js
603 ms
tilda-slides-1.1.min.js
605 ms
tilda-forms-1.0.min.js
641 ms
lazyload-1.3.min.js
606 ms
hotjar-592071.js
470 ms
logoscopy3.png
3201 ms
111.png
2736 ms
222.png
2531 ms
333.png
2531 ms
logogoogle.jpg
2532 ms
logoseb.jpg
2530 ms
logomerck.jpg
2515 ms
logotelenor.jpg
2515 ms
logoblocket.jpg
2595 ms
logopg.jpg
2595 ms
logoprosieben.jpg
2594 ms
logoclarin.jpg
2594 ms
logomade.jpg
2546 ms
logoschibsted.jpg
2546 ms
logoresult.png
3440 ms
result.com
1816 ms
modules-f524bccd859bfc7e394e1123f7f90405.js
4766 ms
rcj-99d43ead6bdf30da8ed5ffcb4f17100c.html
4652 ms
96f9a30d1ad24e69b499ca1f19a794e7.jpg
2657 ms
ScreenShot20170317at104351.png
2592 ms
SIME6795_High_Res.jpg
2591 ms
SIME7834_High_Res.jpg
1999 ms
SEB_logo.svg
1998 ms
google.jpg
2717 ms
merck.jpg
2717 ms
aboutus.jpg
2100 ms
ScreenShot20170224at103853copy.png
1993 ms
ScreenShot20170224at103902.png
2103 ms
ScreenShot20170224at103913.png
2103 ms
ScreenShot20170224at103919.png
2104 ms
a69c154379a24f95be0b26d9d52693db.jpg
2104 ms
Bellasimee1449746271989.jpg
2104 ms
5d788b2c0407454a8a64e7d38fe0b04b.jpg
2101 ms
analytics.js
1625 ms
SIME7834_High_Res.jpg
360 ms
96f9a30d1ad24e69b499ca1f19a794e7.jpg
273 ms
111.png
1069 ms
222.png
1098 ms
333.png
1097 ms
ScreenShot20170317at104351.png
1098 ms
collect
225 ms
collect
299 ms
96f9a30d1ad24e69b499ca1f19a794e7.jpg
400 ms
96f9a30d1ad24e69b499ca1f19a794e7.jpg
29 ms
result.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
result.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
result.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Result.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Result.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
result.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Result. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: