Tools & Wizards About Us
results50.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

results50.in

Results50 | My WordPress Blog

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

750 ms

results50.in screenshot

About Website

Visit results50.in now to see the best up-to-date Results50 content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about results50.in

My WordPress Blog

Visit results50.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Results50.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

results50.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

results50.in

1474 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

335 ms

css

25 ms

athemes-symbols.css

638 ms

bootstrap.min.css

976 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Results50.in, 7% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Results50.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 280.3 kB (77%)

Content Size

363.3 kB

After Optimization

83.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Results50.in main page is 363.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 179.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 43.5 kB

  • Original 50.5 kB
  • After minification 47.3 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 124.9 kB

  • Original 179.6 kB
  • After minification 173.8 kB
  • After compression 54.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 124.9 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 111.9 kB

  • Original 133.1 kB
  • After minification 125.1 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Results50.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 111.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (83%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Results50. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

results50.in

results50.in

1474 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

335 ms

css

css

25 ms

athemes-symbols.css

athemes-symbols.css

638 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

976 ms

style.css

style.css

659 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

987 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

658 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

662 ms

hoverIntent.js

hoverIntent.js

955 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

1034 ms

settings.js

settings.js

982 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1034 ms

afonts.woff

afonts.woff

332 ms

SEO Factors

results50.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Results50.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Results50.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

results50.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: