21.8 sec in total
252 ms
21.3 sec
233 ms
Click here to check amazing Returndb content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about returndb.com
Visit returndb.comWe analyzed Returndb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 21.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
returndb.com performance score
252 ms
54 ms
203 ms
56 ms
124 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Returndb.com, 29% (19 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 17% (11 requests) were made to Cdn.sencha.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Returndb.asuscomm.com.
Page size can be reduced by 566.9 kB (77%)
740.8 kB
173.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Returndb.com main page is 740.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 322.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 94.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Returndb images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 182.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 182.0 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 290.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Returndb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 290.7 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (77%)
62
14
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Returndb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
returndb.com
252 ms
ext-all-neptune.css
54 ms
returndb.css
203 ms
adsbygoogle.js
56 ms
ext-all.js
124 ms
ext-theme-neptune.js
78 ms
jquery.min.js
100 ms
jsapi
65 ms
app6.js
404 ms
ext-theme-neptune-all.css
33 ms
all.js
518 ms
plusone.js
237 ms
ca-pub-3092616727852294.js
110 ms
zrt_lookup.html
109 ms
show_ads_impl.js
109 ms
28 ms
126 ms
RowExpander.js
129 ms
FiltersFeature.js
128 ms
ui+en,controls+en.css
33 ms
webfontloader,format+en,default+en,ui+en,controls+en,corechart+en.I.js
175 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
88 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
87 ms
fastbutton
144 ms
ads
246 ms
osd.js
53 ms
ListMenu.js
155 ms
RangeMenu.js
69 ms
BooleanFilter.js
160 ms
DateFilter.js
154 ms
DateTimeFilter.js
160 ms
ListFilter.js
157 ms
NumericFilter.js
193 ms
StringFilter.js
192 ms
postmessageRelay
183 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
129 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
128 ms
default+en.css
43 ms
default+en.I.js
48 ms
Filter.js
73 ms
1077434459-postmessagerelay.js
479 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
372 ms
589 ms
xd_arbiter.php
562 ms
xd_arbiter.php
753 ms
trigger.png
393 ms
returnI5.php
20098 ms
returnM4.php
20026 ms
exclamation.png
103 ms
hd-pop.png
102 ms
loading.gif
102 ms
default-plain-scroll-left.png
107 ms
default-plain-scroll-right.png
106 ms
tool-sprites.png
107 ms
page-first.png
108 ms
page-prev.png
109 ms
page-next.png
109 ms
page-last.png
109 ms
refresh.png
114 ms
checkbox.png
23 ms
sort_desc.png
30 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
15 ms
like.php
134 ms
Sh_BYjerrZ8.js
511 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
576 ms
returndb.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Returndb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Returndb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
returndb.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Returndb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: