Tools & Wizards About Us
reusablenametags.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

reusablenametags.com

Reusable Name Tags - Blank Name Tags

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

770 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

280 ms

reusablenametags.com screenshot

About Website

Visit reusablenametags.com now to see the best up-to-date Reusable Name Tags content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reusablenametags.com

Get the best reusable name tags right here, where we sell at factory direct prices. The lowest prices on many types like dry erase, domed, logo and label name tags

Visit reusablenametags.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Reusablenametags.com page load time and found that the first response time was 770 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reusablenametags.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

reusablenametags.com

770 ms

theme-da983de0-4498-0135-dc58-525400970412.css

30 ms

css

14 ms

checkout.js

198 ms

index.js

146 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Reusablenametags.com, 46% (16 requests) were made to Cdn6.bigcommerce.com and 23% (8 requests) were made to Cdn5.bigcommerce.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Cdn6.bigcommerce.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 520.3 kB (10%)

Content Size

5.1 MB

After Optimization

4.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Reusablenametags.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 56.6 kB

  • Original 80.1 kB
  • After minification 74.7 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 295.6 kB

  • Original 4.8 MB
  • After minification 4.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reusable Name Tags images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 168.1 kB

  • Original 258.5 kB
  • After minification 255.5 kB
  • After compression 90.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 168.1 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (31%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reusable Name Tags. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

reusablenametags.com

reusablenametags.com

770 ms

theme-da983de0-4498-0135-dc58-525400970412.css

theme-da983de0-4498-0135-dc58-525400970412.css

30 ms

css

css

14 ms

checkout.js

checkout.js

198 ms

index.js

index.js

146 ms

form-poster.min.js

form-poster.min.js

101 ms

braintree.js

braintree.js

145 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

40 ms

analytics.min.js

analytics.min.js

13 ms

fornax.min.js

fornax.min.js

4 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

340 ms

visitor_stencil.js

visitor_stencil.js

76 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

beacon_api.js

beacon_api.js

57 ms

rnametagslogo8_1481982168__45998.png

rnametagslogo8_1481982168__45998.png

300 ms

Another_Collage_Anglexx.jpg

Another_Collage_Anglexx.jpg

874 ms

lopls_collagex__28149.jpg

lopls_collagex__28149.jpg

886 ms

another_collage_angle__15503.jpg

another_collage_angle__15503.jpg

920 ms

collage1__80369.jpg

collage1__80369.jpg

708 ms

name_badge_magnets__25373.jpg

name_badge_magnets__25373.jpg

805 ms

Spires_Market_badge__90761.1481988001.jpg

Spires_Market_badge__90761.1481988001.jpg

1005 ms

DIY_Dome_Tags__47937.1481988733.jpg

DIY_Dome_Tags__47937.1481988733.jpg

992 ms

Dry_Erase_Name_Tags__17603.1483282831.jpg

Dry_Erase_Name_Tags__17603.1483282831.jpg

1338 ms

Yellow_Cored_1x3_JPEG__52447.1482422931.jpg

Yellow_Cored_1x3_JPEG__52447.1482422931.jpg

1018 ms

Oval_Name_Tag_Dome__44207.1482946789.jpg

Oval_Name_Tag_Dome__44207.1482946789.jpg

1861 ms

Economy_Name_Tags__20399.1482428025.jpg

Economy_Name_Tags__20399.1482428025.jpg

1597 ms

Gold_1x3__87323.1482029652.jpg

Gold_1x3__87323.1482029652.jpg

1324 ms

Yeamna_Ass_badge__68554.1481989787.jpg

Yeamna_Ass_badge__68554.1481989787.jpg

1418 ms

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nBPtpc1JAjij63Hi_JcAPQ4.ttf

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nBPtpc1JAjij63Hi_JcAPQ4.ttf

27 ms

Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsMEHkXu385rSv8spHqOuvSI.ttf

Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsMEHkXu385rSv8spHqOuvSI.ttf

27 ms

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nPVE82mBoqAQeMZO1WdebIw.ttf

b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nPVE82mBoqAQeMZO1WdebIw.ttf

28 ms

2NBgzUtEeyB-Xtpr9bm1CS3oLLXpsuqWJ5lOsXwE8Dk.ttf

2NBgzUtEeyB-Xtpr9bm1CS3oLLXpsuqWJ5lOsXwE8Dk.ttf

26 ms

UC3ZEjagJi85gF9qFaBgIN_4_hjs-EL5AH5_D0oZq3U.ttf

UC3ZEjagJi85gF9qFaBgIN_4_hjs-EL5AH5_D0oZq3U.ttf

27 ms

cookie-notification

cookie-notification

229 ms

index.php

index.php

209 ms

Accessibility Review

reusablenametags.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

reusablenametags.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

reusablenametags.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reusablenametags.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reusablenametags.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

reusablenametags.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reusable Name Tags. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: