Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

review-australia.com

Review Australia | Women's Clothing

Page Load Speed

52.7 sec in total

First Response

2.8 sec

Resources Loaded

49.1 sec

Page Rendered

818 ms

review-australia.com screenshot

About Website

Visit review-australia.com now to see the best up-to-date Review Australia content for Australia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about review-australia.com

At Review Australia we’re known for our unique vintage-inspired designs and for striving to empower women to wear what makes them feel fantastic.

Visit review-australia.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Review-australia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 50 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

review-australia.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value29.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,200 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value46.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.review-australia.com

2760 ms

e765fbdb044dd5a7ba8013666fc762e3.css

10203 ms

537e229cfea2cd593cb182cd1b588fa1.js

2575 ms

2cdbc7c55cbff77486970b235fbcaa3b.js

2142 ms

pixlee_widget_1_0_0.js

419 ms

Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Review-australia.com, 14% (15 requests) were made to Static.pixlee.com and 9% (10 requests) were made to Assets.pixlee.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) relates to the external source Shopassist.gdmdigital.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.8 MB (50%)

Content Size

7.5 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Review-australia.com main page is 7.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 37.4 kB

  • Original 50.5 kB
  • After minification 46.8 kB
  • After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 108.8 kB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review Australia images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 1.8 MB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB
  • After compression 718.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 1.8 MB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 721.3 kB
  • After compression 105.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Review-australia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 94% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (54%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

45

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Australia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

review-australia.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

review-australia.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

review-australia.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Review-australia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Review-australia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Review Australia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: