Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

682 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

506 ms

reviewgeeks.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to reviewgeeks.net homepage info - get ready to check Reviewgeeks best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about reviewgeeks.net

ReviewGeeks.net beat any scam found by its editors, and at the same time build trusted reviews for the best products on its niche.

Visit reviewgeeks.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Reviewgeeks.net page load time and found that the first response time was 682 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reviewgeeks.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

reviewgeeks.net

682 ms

www.reviewgeeks.net

1268 ms

style.css

43 ms

coldskin-default.css

66 ms

960.css

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewgeeks.net, 20% (6 requests) were made to I1.wp.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Reviewgeeks.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 212.9 kB (47%)

Content Size

448.3 kB

After Optimization

235.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Reviewgeeks.net main page is 448.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 161.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 36.1 kB

  • Original 43.5 kB
  • After minification 40.2 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 161.3 kB
  • After minification 160.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reviewgeeks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 98.2 kB

  • Original 150.7 kB
  • After minification 149.5 kB
  • After compression 52.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 98.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 77.6 kB

  • Original 92.9 kB
  • After minification 79.2 kB
  • After compression 15.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewgeeks.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (42%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviewgeeks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

reviewgeeks.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewgeeks.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Reviewgeeks.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reviewgeeks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: