5.4 sec in total
2 sec
3.1 sec
365 ms
Visit reviewlution1.com now to see the best up-to-date Reviewlution 1 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reviewlution1.com
Visit reviewlution1.comWe analyzed Reviewlution1.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
reviewlution1.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
45/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.467
19/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
1981 ms
157 ms
163 ms
162 ms
185 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewlution1.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Reviewlution1.com.
Page size can be reduced by 460.3 kB (56%)
815.5 kB
355.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviewlution1.com main page is 815.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 458.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Reviewlution 1 needs image optimization as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 310.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 310.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 105.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewlution1.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 105.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (34%)
62
41
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviewlution 1. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviewlution1.com
1981 ms
bootstrap.css
157 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
163 ms
colorpicker.css
162 ms
datepicker.css
185 ms
style.css
205 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
266 ms
bootstrap.min.js
247 ms
jquery.raty.min.js
246 ms
jquery.pnotify.min.js
253 ms
jquery.pnotify.default.css
260 ms
jquery.pnotify.default.icons.css
289 ms
imperio.general.js
333 ms
jquery.sd.common.js
322 ms
jquery.flot.min.js
367 ms
jquery.flot.resize.min.js
391 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
394 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
397 ms
bootstrap-colorpicker.js
423 ms
imperio.forms.js
425 ms
symmetric-pattern.png
104 ms
logo.png
153 ms
home.png
158 ms
about_us.png
144 ms
packages.png
186 ms
faq.png
185 ms
review_sites.png
184 ms
how_it_works.png
289 ms
demo.png
289 ms
contact_us.png
290 ms
facebook.png
296 ms
linkdin.png
289 ms
twitter.png
289 ms
chat_icon.png
321 ms
how_it_works2.png
326 ms
upload.png
352 ms
add.png
333 ms
post.png
331 ms
relax.png
377 ms
web_monitor.png
411 ms
bad_content.png
410 ms
review.png
408 ms
privacy.png
442 ms
email.png
451 ms
supported_sites.png
507 ms
supported_logo.jpg
485 ms
subnav-shadow.png
487 ms
sign_up.png
507 ms
sign_in.png
505 ms
phone-icon.png
526 ms
promotion_bg.png
527 ms
72528754
79 ms
promo_border.png
542 ms
sub_bg.png
678 ms
home_hover.png
508 ms
player.js
95 ms
player.css
77 ms
ga.js
23 ms
vuid.min.js
90 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
proxy.html
38 ms
446412116.webp
274 ms
5212529_60x60.jpg
94 ms
reviewlution1.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
reviewlution1.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
reviewlution1.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewlution1.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Reviewlution1.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reviewlution1.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reviewlution 1. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: