4 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.4 sec
534 ms
Welcome to reviews.ru homepage info - get ready to check Reviews best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about reviews.ru
Visit reviews.ruWe analyzed Reviews.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
reviews.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value4.3 s
43/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value1,420 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.037
100/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
1091 ms
390 ms
269 ms
225 ms
569 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Reviews.ru, 5% (4 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru and 5% (4 requests) were made to Themes.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Reviews.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 185.8 kB (43%)
428.9 kB
243.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Reviews.ru main page is 428.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 220.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.8 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Reviews needs image optimization as it can save up to 37.7 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 77.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 77.5 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviews.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (52%)
58
28
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
reviews.ru
1091 ms
stile.css
390 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
269 ms
watch.js
225 ms
watch.js
569 ms
analytics.js
24 ms
button2.gif
753 ms
top100.cnt
273 ms
logo
380 ms
banner-88x31-rambler-gray2.gif
271 ms
3.png
390 ms
2.jpg
136 ms
kvadratiki.gif
135 ms
b1.gif
266 ms
search_back.gif
283 ms
template_MAIN_r2_c2.gif
276 ms
text2.gif
422 ms
prev_rev.gif
316 ms
1.jpg
454 ms
trans.gif
455 ms
pop_review1.jpg
683 ms
recomenduem1.JPG
452 ms
small.gif
519 ms
midl.gif
550 ms
3.jpg
638 ms
m1.jpg
747 ms
m1.jpg
746 ms
m.jpg
746 ms
m.jpg
750 ms
m.jpg
751 ms
m.jpg
889 ms
m.jpg
869 ms
m.jpg
893 ms
m.jpg
894 ms
m.jpg
888 ms
m.jpg
891 ms
m.jpg
998 ms
m.jpg
1036 ms
m.jpg
1034 ms
midl.gif
1037 ms
1.jpg
716 ms
top_logo1.jpg
719 ms
top4.jpg
638 ms
search_back1.gif
666 ms
b1_1.gif
758 ms
collect
12 ms
oxrPYIm05JrY_0rFIEQ_obO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
58 ms
MLKvhAbswThSVACnSTWCp7O3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
106 ms
AUCtrbkQaDYHKI8RVX5mW-vvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
87 ms
X_EdMnknKUltk57alVVbV7O3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
192 ms
cnt
375 ms
hit
339 ms
cnt
374 ms
template_MAIN_r2_c3.gif
734 ms
text_back.gif
757 ms
collect
69 ms
back1.gif
713 ms
back2.gif
788 ms
footer.gif
789 ms
arrow.xml
533 ms
hit
133 ms
advert.gif
226 ms
u3015.53.spylog.com
238 ms
u3015.53.spylog.com
260 ms
1
223 ms
ysearch_small.png
416 ms
counter2
160 ms
cnt
245 ms
cnt
247 ms
button2.gif
160 ms
m1.jpg
170 ms
m.jpg
189 ms
m1.jpg
190 ms
m.jpg
287 ms
m.jpg
413 ms
counter
185 ms
hotlog_redirects
199 ms
m.jpg
170 ms
m.jpg
155 ms
m.jpg
175 ms
m.jpg
175 ms
m.jpg
274 ms
m.jpg
275 ms
m.jpg
173 ms
m.jpg
158 ms
m.jpg
158 ms
midl.gif
256 ms
reviews.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
reviews.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
reviews.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
RU
N/A
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviews.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Reviews.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
reviews.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: