Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

reviewsnap.org

Review Snap - Product Reviews Place

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

336 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

2.9 sec

reviewsnap.org screenshot

About Website

Visit reviewsnap.org now to see the best up-to-date Review Snap content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reviewsnap.org

Product Reviews Place

Visit reviewsnap.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Reviewsnap.org page load time and found that the first response time was 336 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

reviewsnap.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

reviewsnap.org

336 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

41 ms

A.jquery.miniColors.css,qver=4.2.7.pagespeed.cf.6OerNZETGw.css

8 ms

A.style.css,qver=2.1.2.pagespeed.cf.mKpfFKeM38.css

10 ms

jquery.js,qver=1.11.2.pagespeed.jm.0kUhGt7Mm3.js

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewsnap.org, 33% (15 requests) were made to I1.wp.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Photo.tinhte.vn.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 482.8 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Reviewsnap.org main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 78.5 kB

  • Original 113.0 kB
  • After minification 112.5 kB
  • After compression 34.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 33.4 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 993.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Review Snap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 353.6 kB

  • Original 546.3 kB
  • After minification 546.1 kB
  • After compression 192.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 353.6 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 17.3 kB

  • Original 22.8 kB
  • After minification 22.6 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewsnap.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (23%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Snap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

reviewsnap.org SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reviewsnap.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reviewsnap.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Review Snap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: